2009 and all that - reasons to be (relatively) cheerful
As Legal Week went to press on the final issue of last year, the end of 2011 was starting to look a lot like the closing days of 2008. A global economy slowing, chaos in financial markets and a huge overhang of debt in all directions – well, you hardly need me to draw a picture...
January 12, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
As Legal Week went to press on the final issue of last year, the end of 2011 was starting to look a lot like the closing days of 2008. A global economy slowing, chaos in financial markets and a huge overhang of debt in all directions – well, you hardly need me to draw a picture. Confidence appeared to be visibly draining as reports emerged of a magic circle firm set for a restructuring (then Clifford Chance, this time Linklaters).
It had reached the point where the question on the minds of many partners was how much the opening months of the New Year were going to look like the equivalent period in 2009, when the City was gripped by an unprecedented wave of job cuts and restructurings.
Step forward a few weeks and it's a mark of how far expectations have fallen in the 'New Normal' that the outlook appears less apocalyptic than in darkest December.
In part this is thanks to developments in the wider economy – including co-ordinated intervention from central banks, recovery bedding down in the US and a run of less gloomy economic indicators. But more specifically, there has been a feeling among law firms that the slowing deal market has not yet repeated the 'falling off a cliff' moment seen in the wake of the banking crisis in 2008. Times are tough – they have been for three years now – but so far the substantial cuts to the cost base of law firms are keeping most firms on solid ground.
Our confidence poll this week is striking in this regard – while partners believe growth prospects have weakened since the summer, 82% are still forecasting growth at their own firm over the next 12 months. These figures are far ahead of the numbers we polled in January 2009 – only 45% then thought their firm could grow income over the next 12 months.
Furthermore, only 6% of partners are expecting sizeable staff cuts at their firms this year. Also interesting in this regard are figures from Mergermarket, showing bid activity globally moved upwards in 2011 and – for all the gloom – remaining well up on 2009 levels.
Those numbers do contradict the consensus view of how hard it is out there. Part of the discrepancy between received wisdom and a less doom-laden reality is that law firms have for three years been lectured on how awful their outlook is – claims that in many cases have been exaggerated and some have proved plain wrong. (Anyone remember the widely-reported claim about 10,000 solicitors losing their jobs?)
Nevertheless, it's going to be an unforgiving market. More firms are (rightly) looking for bold steps rather than waiting for the days of plenty to return and senior law firm leaders are beginning to actively plan for pressure from bluechip clients to unbundle buying in many gory forms. But the good news is that it could have looked a lot worse.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Uber Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable for Driver's Alleged Negligent Conduct
- 2TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 3California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 4New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 5Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250