Bonus season – the pros of treating junior lawyers fairly, if not equally
Back in May, Legal Week tallied up the number of law firm jobs placed at risk of redundancy over the previous 12 months. The figure reached was a rather shocking 1,300, including some 750 jobs that had actually been cut at that point. Since then, the number of firms announcing redundancy programmes has slowed dramatically, although not completely. Several firms including DWF, Taylor Wessing and Bond Dickinson have made cuts – particularly following mergers and back office outsourcing deals.
December 05, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Back in May, Legal Week tallied up the number of law firm jobs placed at risk of redundancy over the previous 12 months. The figure reached was a rather shocking 1,300, including some 750 jobs that had actually been cut at that point.
Since then, the number of firms announcing redundancy programmes has slowed dramatically, although not completely. Several firms including DWF, Taylor Wessing and Bond Dickinson have made cuts – particularly following mergers and back office outsourcing deals.
Many law firms had fat to shed when the downturn hit, but it is support staff and fee earners who have borne the brunt of their slimming-down efforts. Partners have been 'restructured', 'managed out' and 'de-equitised' along the way, but in nothing like the same numbers. And more to the point, partner profits have as a whole been only marginally affected.
So as more confidence returns to the market, it has been encouraging to see firms taking steps to reward their best-performing junior lawyers again after a run of pay freezes across the market. This week Linklaters joined fellow magic circle firms Slaughter and May and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in introducing a merit-based component to associate pay. From next May, Linklaters associates with more than two years' PQE will be eligible for a bonus relating to performance. Meanwhile, Slaughters this week unveiled details of its new package, topping up its best lawyers' pay by up to 12%. RPC announced similar performance-driven initiatives last month.
Whether associate salaries are set at the right starting level is a separate argument, but the introduction of a merit-based element – particularly one not so strongly rooted in billable hours targets – is easy to get behind.
Law is – and is set to remain – a hard-working, long-hours profession. Few who start out doing their LPC and GDL will end up as partners. But the structure of the profession, with its tightly guarded equity, is such that it relies upon a bedrock of knowledgeable junior lawyers to make the sums work and to keep client bills down.
Many studies will tell you that money is often not, despite what people may think, the primary reason for workplace happiness. Recognition, by contrast, plays a big part. And little causes more resentment in the office than the feeling that others are not pulling their weight or that your hard work is going unrecognised.
So while the number of fee earners receiving these merit-based bonuses will probably be far lower than the excitement generated by firms would have you believe, such structures – used correctly – will be a strong retention tool for the people they really need to keep.
Click here for all the latest on law firm pay and bonuses.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250