Debt becomes them – an increase in borrowing may not be a bad thing but firms must tread carefully
Law firms are upping their borrowing as the banks are happy to lend again, but is it a sign of the return of the good times?
June 05, 2014 at 07:08 PM
3 minute read
Shakespeare always intended Polonius to come across as an anachronistic old fool, but it's strange to think that the faithful counsel's most famous words might also apply to modern day commercial banking.
Of course, if the world had followed his diktat to steer clear of lending and borrowing, free market capitalism would never have seen the light of day.
However, for a long time, law firms have more or less eschewed the path taken by so many of their clients and reacted to the notion of debt in much the same way as Dracula does to a pot of aioli. That attitude has been slowly changing in recent years, and a detailed analysis of LLP filings from 2012-13, carried out by EY for Legal Week, shows that borrowing is very much in vogue among the top 50 firms.
What does this sudden – at least in the context of the slow-moving pace at which the sector traditionally changes – rush to the arms of the banks tell us about the state of health of these firms? Well, not a lot actually because, while money is money is money, the acquisition of debt can be used to hide a multitude of balance sheet sins.
It is true that many of those firms that upped borrowing in 2012-13 did so to fund growth plans that were set in place as the light at the end of the recessionary tunnel began to appear. Yet with clients taking longer and longer to pay their bills – as EY's research also shows – there is a danger that the freeing up of bank credit has come at a time when some firms are more likely to experience short-term cashflow problems.
Borrowing to open an office in Timbuktu is one thing; doing it to pay partners' quarterly drawings is quite another. And while we don't know either the tenor or terms of the loans banks are offering to firms, we can be pretty sure that they are not being marketed at pre-crisis rates.
The fact that money looks to be available again is probably, on balance, a good thing. But using relatively easy credit to cover a short-term cash shortage is a risky game. After all, robbing Peter to pay Paul has been the first step in the demise of many a business, including one or two law firms.
Polonius, bless him, may have been misguided, but law firms should bear him in mind when they next go to see their bank manager.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Can Blockchain and the Law Ever Be Reconciled? Can Blockchain and the Law Ever Be Reconciled?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/01/082A3221-767x633.jpg)
![McDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent McDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2022/10/Garrett-Hayes_2-767x633.jpg)
McDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute read![Re-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic Re-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2020/11/Rosenbaum_Richard-Article-202011020431.jpg)
Re-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute read![Diversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes Diversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2017/01/image616x372-22.jpg)
Diversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250