A break from grafting: are early sabbaticals a bad idea for junior lawyers?
If your current role isn't 100% your type on paper, a career break could be the answer - but don't put all your eggs in one basket
July 06, 2018 at 04:29 AM
4 minute read
Rosie Williams was officially 'pied' two weeks ago after new Love Island contestant Sam chose 'unlucky in love' Samira to couple up with. With Love Island back on our screens for summer, it's been hard to escape – even the legal press have been covering it…
Since her exit, Love Island fans (and eavesdroppers) have been wondering if Rosie will return to the legal profession, or instead take advantage of the lucrative Instagram deals she will no doubt be offered.
Rosie only qualified as a solicitor three months before entering the most talked-about reality show of recent times. TV villain Piers Morgan was the first to criticise Rosie for leaving her law career to "look stupid on TV". Although his remarks were unduly harsh, it does put the spotlight on whether having a career break so early on is a wise decision for junior lawyers.
Saying that, a career break can be a very exciting opportunity for junior lawyers to expand their experience, understand their motivations and help develop the right kind of soft skills needed for their legal career.
In the past, work experience was valued more than emotional intelligence – i.e. the ability to engage with people and thrive in teams, as well as problem-solve. Now things are changing due to the legal tech revolution, which is certainly changing the role of lawyers. Law firms need personable lawyers who can establish trust and good working relationships with their clients.
In order for you as a junior solicitor to get the most out of your career break, it's good to get the GDL, LPC and training contract under your belt first, before of course applying for the latest reality TV gameshow. This will demonstrate to future employers that you are committed to a career in the law profession and have the right experience to start off with. Here a few other things to consider before taking a career break:
What do you hope to gain from the experience? If you can only include on your CV gambling your savings at a Vegas casino or glugging back a bucket mixer at the full-moon party, it might be worth reassessing how you can utilise your time away to boost your career prospects. Working abroad, learning a new language or volunteering demonstrate to future employers that you're motivated to take the plunge and try something new, as well as being committed to developing your skills.
How long should your break be? Remember that any break longer than a year means you will need to reapply for a practising certificate, as well as demonstrate that you are competent to practise. If a break that long makes you feel nervous, two to three months may be best for you. Check if your law firm offers an opportunity to take a secondment or sabbatical.
How will it help your career in the long run? If you went from university straight to training contract, some time away from the legal bubble can help you reflect and reassess what you want from your legal career. There are many paths to choose – it could be that your goal is partnership, to be a professional support lawyer or to work flexibly as a contract lawyer. Working out how your break can help you climb the legal ladder to achieve your career ambitions is really important. For instance, you may use your time away to gain experience in an industry that you are keen to specialise in.
Consider flexible work. When you return from your break, it might be that the traditional working pattern just doesn't suit – if this sounds familiar, contract lawyering might be an option to give you more control over your day-to-day work/life balance and offer more variety to the sort of legal work you're doing.
As well as a love interest in Mallorca, a legal career is worth grafting for. Crack on with your break, but remember to make the most out of it for your legal career.
Matthew Kay is director at Vario for Pinsent Masons.
- Click here for more from Legal Ladder, our dedicated careers blog to help lawyers and recruiters keep abreast of the key issues facing the profession
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250