EU Orders Broadcom to Halt Allegedly Anti-Competitive Practices
The European Commission took the unusual step of ordering an injunction on Broadcom to limit its dominance of the market as its investigation of the firm continues.
October 16, 2019 at 12:22 PM
3 minute read
The European Union took the unusual step of imposing interim measures on semiconductor maker Broadcom Inc. to limit its dominance of the market.
The injunction marks the first time the EU has used such a measure in 18 years and comes at a time when the EU has been increasing its scrutiny of large tech companies. It orders Broadcom to stop putting anti-competitive restrictions on sales agreements with customers to avoid "serious and irreparable" harm to the market.
The probe into Broadcom's practices is ongoing.
"We have strong indications that Broadcom, the world's leading supplier of chipsets used for TV set-top boxes and modems, is engaging in anti-competitive practices," said Margrethe Vestager, the EU's antitrust chief. "Broadcom's behaviour is likely, in the absence of intervention, to create serious and irreversible harm to competition. We cannot let this happen, or else European customers and consumers would face higher prices and less choice and innovation."
Broadcom is the world's largest supplier of chipsets for TV set-top boxes and modems, which are integral to cable TV services.
The European Commission has alleged that Broadcom is imposing restrictions in its agreements with its six main customers that prevent them from buying chipsets from other suppliers. These measures include price rebates and preferential technical support deals.
Broadcom was ordered to end these restrictions within 30 days and the interim measures will remain in force for up to three years. Completion of the investigation into the company's behaviour is expected by the middle of next year.
Alec Burnside, a partner at Dechert's Brussels office, said the appetite for interim measures comes out of the perception that antitrust remedies have been too slow and markets have tipped by the time the Commission gets there.
"The Commission wants to be providing an ambulance service rather than sending out hearses," he added.
Catriona Hatton, antitrust and competition partner in Baker Botts' Brussels office, said investigations like these can run for years, so ordering a company to stop certain practices in the meantime is a very interventionist approach.
"It is particularly interesting for digital markets, as recently we have seen a lot of antitrust commentary and regulator and expert support advocating greater use of these measures to prevent irreparable harm to competition in fast-moving markets, pending the outcome of antitrust investigations," she said. "So today's development signals a shift towards more up-front intervention by the European Commission in digital markets."
Broadcom said in a statement that it intends to appeal the Commission's decision but will in the meantime comply with the Commission's order. The court's judgment in the appeal would determine how much scope the Commission has to pursue this type of action in future cases, Hatton said.
|Related stories:
EU Opens Antitrust Probe of Broadcom, Imposes Interim Measures to Halt Non-competitive Practices
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHogan Lovells, Khaitan Lead On Beverage Company’s $890M Offering In India
Clifford Chance Adds Two Goodwin Leveraged Finance Specialists as Partners in Paris
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attorney-Client Privilege: Recent Informative Decisions
- 2Here We Go Again: Trump and the Coming Civil Rights Storm
- 3'The Hubris of Big Tech': Apple Hit With California Labor Lawsuit for Alleged Free Speech, Privacy Violations
- 4Litigator of the (Past) Week: A $34.7M Defamation Win For Former Walmart Truck Driver
- 5A Major Bellwether for Trans Rights?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250