Female Lawyers in Mexico Will 'Disappear' for a Day to Call Attention to Rampant Gender Violence
Nearly a dozen firms, including Hogan Lovells and a Lex Mundi affiliate, join a women's strike to advocate for equality and rule of law.
March 05, 2020 at 05:00 AM
6 minute read
Mexican law firms have rallied around a call for women to "become invisible" March 9, as the country grasps for ways to address endemic and increasingly gruesome gender violence.
"This is a real crisis," said Juan Francisco Torres-Landa, head of the Mexico office for Hogan Lovells, who added that supporting the strike was a no-brainer. "We need to break the inertia that this is normal."
The momentum for a women's strike began in mid-February, following the brutal murder in Mexico City of a young woman whose body was skinned and disemboweled allegedly by her husband. A few days later, a 7-year-old was abducted outside her elementary school, sexually abused and killed; the child's body was found inside a plastic bag, tossed in an empty field.
Those events sent women once again to the streets of the capital to protest. One masked protester tried to torch the doors of the presidential palace while others doused it with red paint. Afterward, activists for gender equality began to reflect on how else they could express outrage over violence against women and hopefully spur real change.
Thus began the push for "A Day Without Us."
The idea is that women and girls completely remove themselves from society that day—staying home, not engaging in social media, skipping school and work—so that the country feels their absence and values their contributions.
Hector Herrera, president of the Mexican Bar, has called on all firms in the association to respect the strike by women March 9, saying the bar itself would give its own female personnel the day off, with pay.
"We hope this action contributes to a reflection to provoke change that eradicates violence against women," Herrera said in a statement posted to Twitter.
Mexico recorded 3,825 cases of women killed because of their gender last year, a crime catalogued as femicide that carries harsher penalties than other homicides in Mexico. That averages to more than 10 females murdered every day, making Mexico one of the most dangerous countries in the world for girls and women. Only one of every 10 reported crimes in Mexico results in jail time.
A growing number of Mexican lawyers say that in addition to half the population being at a high risk of suffering violence, rule of law is also in jeopardy. Lynchings are on the rise in the country as Mexicans lose faith in their justice system.
Thousands are planning to march in the streets this Sunday—International Women's Day. Organizers expect marchers to include families of victims, masked female activists, who themselves have been targeted, as well as many upper-crust Mexicans.
The call to stage the "Day Without Us" on the Monday following the march was quickly embraced by female lawyers at multiple firms. Close to a dozen law firms in Mexico have stated publicly that they will support the effort by not retaliating against women who are absent, actively encouraging women to participate and designating male co-workers to cover for female employees while they're gone.
Mexican firm Santamarina + Steta, for example, expects its entire female staff to become "invisible" that day. Basham, Ringe y Correa—the Lex Mundi representative in Mexico—flat-out asked its female employees not to show up to work March 9.
Hogan Lovells is encouraging, but not forcing, female employees to participate in the mock disappearance.
"It would do us all good to feel that void," said Torres-Landa, describing both the rising violence and fragility of the Mexican legal system as issues that are crying out for greater visibility.
Hogan Lovells partner Brenda Rogel, who is on maternity leave, plans to observe the strike by asking her mother to stay home rather than help with her three children, and by giving domestic help the day off as well.
"This is a moment to make a strong statement about gender violence," said Rogel, who advises clients on environmental liability and risk assessment.
Companies ranging from media conglomerates to major banks are endorsing the women's strike. Going silent, even for a day, will come at a cost. Mexican business chamber Coparmex estimates that the work stoppage will result in financial losses of more than $300 million just in the capital of Mexico City.
Even so, the chamber is encouraging companies to participate, saying the financial losses are minor given the gravity of the situation. Coparmex also expressed optimism that the strike will inspire a change in mindsets that results in more women working and contributing to the economic development of the megalopolis. Women account for just under half of those employed in the city of 9 million.
"We are full of rage as a society," Leonor Quiroz, a lawyer and national delegate for inclusion and equality at Coparmex, said in a video message. "It's not just a sick man that's killing us—it's a whole system."
The challenge now, lawyers say, is to turn the call to march and strike into real action that can erode the machismo and gender bias that plagues Mexico. Half of the women murdered in Mexico are killed by their own domestic partners. At the same time, Mexican institutions lack the budget, sensitivity and often desire to punish the perpetrators.
"This is an eye-opener for Mexico. This is long overdue—the uproar, the cause itself and also the march," said Enrique González Calvillo, founding partner of González Calvillo, one of the first Mexican law firms to join the strike.
González Calvillo expects that over 100 women at his firm will observe the strike, sending the message, "Imagine your life without me," while the rest of the office remains open for business. González Calvillo says his firm, which handles M&A and other transactions largely for non-Mexican companies, employs more women than men—a reflection of the changing gender profile of corporate counsel and clients.
"It's important for us to experience not having that part of the team, suffering the absence," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTribunal Dismisses AML Case Against Kennedys’ Chief Risk Officer, But Ex-Partner Fined
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
2 minute readDLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250