Foley & Lardner Sees US-Mexico Trade Continue as Companies Scramble to Produce Essential Goods
Clients on both sides of the border are seeking advice on whether and how to keep business going amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
March 27, 2020 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
The cross-border team at Foley & Lardner is working long hours to counsel corporate clients in Mexico and the United States on how they can continue operating as the coronavirus spreads and how they can get into the fight against the pandemic while protecting their people.
Countless residents in both countries are staying home in an effort to contain COVID-19, while movement across the U.S.' southern border has been restricted. As of Thursday, there were more than 80,000 confirmed cases in the U.S. and 585 reported in Mexico.
For both countries, it is crucial that goods continue to flow across the U.S.-Mexico border as the virus spreads. Prior to the outbreak, Mexican workers supplied one in three fresh fruits and vegetables consumed in the U.S. while also producing medical equipment, including ventilators.
Mexico's $1.2 trillion manufacturing-heavy economy, meanwhile, depends on U.S. consumers purchasing its exports.
Companies on both sides of the border are navigating a patchwork of local restrictions and suggested quarantines, with little clear guidance at the federal level on how to respond to the global pandemic.
Foley partner Alejandro Gómez-Strozzi, who provides advisory and consulting services related to international commerce and administrative law in Mexico, says trade has so far not been disrupted as companies scurry to determine to what extent they should continue to produce goods and services while also taking care of their employees and doing what's right for public health.
"Troubled times are a source of business, and we have been really busy trying to help our clients balance as needed in order to be disrupted less," said Gómez-Strozzi, who is based in Mexico City. "And to make things more interesting, the Mexican government has not been very clear as to what should and should not be done."
The Mexican government issued guidance March 24 telling employers to temporarily halt activities that lead people to commute or concentrate in large groups. That guidance is very much open to interpretation. Many who can work remotely are doing so, while manufacturing largely continues.
Gómez-Strozzi says he's helping clients, on a case-by-case basis, assess how to accommodate the executive order while also fulfilling their contractual requirements. Suppliers of foodstuffs such as poultry and eggs, for instance, should consider themselves essential, he said.
On the other side of the border, in Washington, D.C., Foley partner Christopher Swift is counseling clients who are eager to get into the fight against the epidemic, without compromising the health and safety of their personnel and the general public.
He has been involved in discussions with U.S. companies trying to retool to manufacture ventilators in the U.S. Personal protective equipment for medical professionals, meanwhile, is coming into the country from locations such as China and Mexico, where there are fewer reported infections and the items are cheaper to produce, he said.
While cross-border trade continues to flow, Swift says companies have largely put plans to invest in Mexico on hold. Prior to the global pandemic, 160 U.S.-based executives from the manufacturing, automotive, retail and technology sectors indicated in a Foley survey that they intended to move business to Mexico, expand internationally for the first time via Mexico or grow existing Mexican operations—and to do so rapidly, within the next one to five years.
"We expect to see future investments in cross-border manufacturing activity deferred for at least a quarter," said Swift. "There's just too much going on in the U.S. for people to focus on plans they had a month ago."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250