Lawyers in Mexico Scurry to Prepare for USMCA Trade Terms
The new trade agreement for North America takes effect July 1, ushering in tougher labor, content and wage requirements.
June 30, 2020 at 01:32 PM
4 minute read
Mexican lawyers and trade professionals are rushing to prepare clients for the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, which takes effect Wednesday.
The coronavirus has laid bare the importance of shoring up North American supply chains and manufacturing after countries in the region found themselves scrambling for locally produced medical supplies and technology. All three economies are now sorely hurting after months of quarantines.
"Now more than ever, it is crucial that the three parties think as a trade bloc and not as separate countries," said Adriana Ibarra-Fernandez, a partner with Baker McKenzie in Mexico City who once served as legal director of rules of origin, customs procedures and safeguards in the Mexican Economy Ministry.
Ibarra-Fernandez views the trade pact as a "great opportunity" to reactivate economic activity across North America following the arrival of COVID-19. In the shorter term, she says companies are hustling to review whether changes to rules of origin apply to their products, contacting suppliers to request new certificates of origin and preparing to issue USMCA certificates to customers.
The lower house of the Mexican congress was set to approve a raft of complementary legislation during an emergency session to update laws governing areas such as intellectual property and customs to comply with the trade agreement. And on Monday, Mexico published USMCA as a replacement for the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement in the government's official gazette.
The document in the gazette, signed by both President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard, said all three countries seek to "again strengthen the long-standing friendship between them and their people, and the solid economic cooperation that they have developed through trade and investment."
It also emphasized that the countries seek to "improve and promote competitiveness of the region's exports and companies in global markets."
Trade lawyers say Mexico is in an enviable position to win manufacturing market share as the U.S. seeks to detangle supply chains from China. Yet during the pandemic, Mexico has sent worrisome signals to foreign investors by nixing a U.S.-built beer factory and issuing rules that made unviable dozens of projects in the electricity sector.
Already, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has warned of legal challenges to come against Mexico under USMCA if the country fails to enforce new labor rules, and of a potential state-to-state dispute settlement case over Mexico's reluctance to approve biotech products.
"There's a lot of anxiety about what the trade deal will bring," said Juan Francisco Torres-Landa, managing partner of Hogan Lovells' Mexico office and soon-to-be head of the firm's Latin America practice group. "This is not going to be a smooth process—this is going to be a bumpy road."
Torres-Landa perceives a mismatch between expectations that the trade agreement can usher in economic growth and development for Mexico, since he sees government policies creating an "adverse environment" for private sector investment.
The agreement includes an annex to address labor conditions and oppressed wages in Mexico. Specifically, the USMCA calls for collective bargaining and secret votes for unions to dilute the influence of business owners in Mexico and allows U.S. labor inspectors to visit facilities in Mexico.
"The labor aspects of the USMCA are unprecedented," said John Foote, a partner in Baker McKenzie's Washington, D.C., office who advises companies on international trade. "We have never seen provisions like this in any previous trade agreement—labor standards that are enforceable against individual companies, and which tie the agreement's benefits, and even market access, to compliance with those standards."
Mexican tax powerhouse Chevez Ruiz Zamarripa has warned clients that the U.S. government will now have the authority under USMCA to deny preferential tariffs for goods produced by Mexican companies that don't meet agreed-upon labor standards.
Industry is struggling to get back online in Mexico after months of shutdowns aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19. The López Obrador administration deemed car-assembly, mining and construction essential activities and allowed their operations to resume starting June 1.
Still, high infection rates have delayed some openings in the key automotive sector, which represents about a fifth of Mexico's manufacturing gross domestic product. The USMCA aims to raise regional content requirements for vehicles assembled and sold under favorable tariffs in North America, and also to increase wages for Mexican workers in that industry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250