Ricoh Remlox Brings Data Forensics Into The Cloud
The new Remlox Cloud platform pushes Ricoh's data forensics services into the cloud space.
January 26, 2018 at 12:23 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Jevanto Productions/Shutterstock.com. |
Data forensics, an increasingly important business practice, is a little more difficult to manage with a remote workforce. Ricoh's original Remlox product came out of the need to help organizations navigate information governance policies in an age where employees aren't always sitting together in the same office building. “The goal was to have exactly the same result as if we sent a forensic person on site to collect this in a traditional manner,” David Greetham, head of Ricoh's e-discovery business unit, told LTN.
The company this week launched Remlox Cloud, a cloud-based data forensics tool, as the latest iteration of the platform. The group touts the accessibility and security in data extraction offered through the cloud infrastructure.
Here's a look at the new tool:
Who it serves: Remlox Cloud can theoretically do forensic data extraction for any given use case, but Greetham pointed out two that might be of particular use. Operating a data forensics tool remotely can help organizations specifically deal with information governance around remote workers and contractors, for one.
Secondly, the Remlox Cloud platform is well optimized for speed, meaning that if legal holds or forensic data needs to be extracted and reviewed in a crisis situation, the platform can deliver. “Nobody wants to have a fire drill. Nobody wants that to be the case, but in reality sometimes in litigation that is the case,” Greetham said of the tool.
What it does: Once organizational teams decide what forensic data they need from a given users' computer, be it office documents, Quickbooks data, email messages or the like, they send a request to that user with a link via email. When the user clicks that link, Remlox Cloud deploys a script to collect all that data, encrypt it, and send it back to its cloud environment (the platform uses Microsoft Azure, a public cloud infrastructure). The process also comes along with a descriptive document that can be used to explain to courts how the process is compliant with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments governing proportionality.
Remlox Cloud's data ingestion plays well with e-discovery review tools like Relativity and Ricoh's own eDiscovery On Demand platform, and it uses a set of automated tools to help users manage that data once extracted. “We have much more automation than we've ever had before. We can reserve [data] for litigation hold—if you need to review this, we can automatically move it to On Demand. You could actually be reviewing it in the same day,” Greetham noted.
Why the cloud? Over the last few years, cloud-based platforms have established themselves as more than a passing fad. Cloud data hosting tends to have greater data protection and control mechanisms in place for security, and can be used to spool up or scale computing processes quickly, two things that have allowed the infrastructure to take hold of the industry.
Greetham said that Ricoh adopted the cloud infrastructure because “it gives us a flexibility and a scalability to be able to be agile and proactive. Really in our industry, it's a requirement to be a good business partner.”
How to avoid the potential for phishing: An email with a link that runs a script should at this point raise a million red flags for users that they might be on the receiving end of a phishing attack. Greetham said that when Ricoh was running beta testing for Remlox Cloud, they ran into this concern from users a lot.
To pacify users, the company encourages users to double check its security certificate and to confirm with an account administrator to verify the link within the body of the original email. “We realized a lot of it is how you present it and how you give them assurance,” Greetham said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250