Daily Dicta: Record $100M Helicopter Crash Payout; The Met Can Keep its Picasso; Why Andy Sandler Is Exiting his Firm
In what appears to be the largest pre-trial settlement ever of a single personal injury case, Airbus Helicopters and Air Methods Corp. agreed to pay $100 million to settle claims arising from a 2015 crash.
February 08, 2018 at 11:44 AM
9 minute read
In what appears to be the largest pre-trial settlement ever of a single personal injury case, Airbus Helicopters and Air Methods Corp. agreed to pay $100 million to settle claims arising from a 2015 crash.
“I've been doing this now for 37 years, and by far these were the most horrific injuries I've ever seen,” said plaintiffs lawyer Gary Robb of Robb & Robb.
Flight nurse David Repsher suffered burns over 90 percent of his body, in some places down to the bone. The Airbus helicopter he was riding in burst into flames when it crashed 32 seconds after takeoff in a parking lot next to the St. Anthony Summit Medical Center in Frisco, Colorado.
“It's amazing this man survived,” Robb said. “He spent nine months in the burn unit, he had 400 surgical procedures. He went from weighing 189 pounds to 87 pounds. He had to re-learn to swallow, eat, talk, roll over, stand and walk.” In addition to being disfigured, Repsher's kidneys failed, he has permanent hearing loss and loss of function of his hands.
The suit was filed in the District Court of Summit County in Breckenridge, Colorado in 2015. Apart from his client's devastating injuries, Robb said he focused on the fact that the helicopter did not have a crash-resistant fuel system, which has been mandated on newly-certified helicopters since 1994.
Because it lacked such a system, the helicopter burst into flames 1.8 seconds after impact, giving Repsher no time to escape. “It was not a high-impact crash,” Robb said. “He could have walked away.”
A report by the National Transportation Safety Board also cited Airbus' preflight hydraulic check, lack of warning related to tail rotor hydraulic system pressure and design of the dual hydraulic system as causes of the crash.
Trial was scheduled for March 5 when the parties struck a deal on Feb. 1. According to VerdictSearch, it's the highest payout ever to a single plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Airbus was represented by a team from Nixon Peabody led by Joseph Ortego and Wheeler, Trigg, O'Donnell LLP. Medical transport company Air Methods Corp. was represented by Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, with William Katt as lead trial counsel.
|
The Met Wins Suit Seeking Return of Picasso Masterpiece
The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York can keep its $150 million painting, “The Actor,” by Pablo Picasso.
On Wednesday, Senior U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska of the Southern District of New York dismissed a suit by the great-niece of the painting's original owners, German Jews Paul and Alice Leffmann. They sold the work in 1938 when they fled Fascist Italy for Switzerland and then Brazil.
It's a big win for the museum and its legal team, led by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr international litigation chair David Bowker.
I wrote about the suit in July. To recap: the Leffmann's great-niece, Laurel Zuckerman, represented by Lawrence Kaye of Herrick, Feinstein LLP, asserted that the painting was sold under duress and for less than fair market value—the equivalent of about $250,000 today—to Picasso's dealer, Paul Rosenberg, and collector Hugo Perls, in Paris. It was later gifted to the museum by Thelma Chrysler Foy, whose father founded Chrysler.
Zuckerman wanted the painting back plus $100 million in damages.
But Preska dismissed her claim for failure to allege duress under New York law. The judge noted that the Leffmanns took nearly two years to sell the painting (which was safely in Switzerland), rejected offers from other dealers, attempted to improve their leverage to maximize the sale price, and had other assets that they sold, including property in Italy.
“[T]he 1938 transaction occurred between private individuals, not at the command of the Fascist or Nazi governments,” Preska wrote. “Thus although the Leffmanns felt economic pressure during the undeniably horrific circumstances of the Nazi and Fascist regimes, that pressure, when not caused by the counterparties to the transaction (or the defendant) … is insufficient to prove duress with respect to the transaction.”
|Andy Sandler to Exit Buckley Sandler for New Ventures
Andy Sandler is not one to sit back and play it safe.
In 2009, he gave up the security of a partnership at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, where he headed the consumer financial services enforcement and litigation practice, to team up with Buckley Kolar and launch Buckley Sandler.
Now, in an exclusive interview Sandler shared that he will leave the firm he helped build on March 20—nine years to the day after it was founded.
He'll devote himself to running his three other companies instead: financial services industry consulting firm Treliant, compliance software provider Asurity, and private investment company Temerity.
In retrospect, his workload seems almost superhuman: During his tenure as chairman and executive partner of 158-lawyer Buckley Sandler—which in 2016 was the second-most profitable Am Law 200 firm, with profits per partner of $2.6 million—Sandler simultaneously launched three new businesses.
Treliant is the oldest, established in 2009 to advise bankers, lenders, mortgage and brokerage companies and FinTech firms on compliance, risk management and operations. Buckley Sandler was originally an investor, but Sandler later bought the firm out.
He went on to found Temerity in 2014, which makes real estate and venture capital investments (it helped fund Lyft), as well as equity investments in “misunderstood, undervalued companies.” That was followed by Asurity in 2015, which bills itself as “RegTech solutions built by compliance experts.”
The entities are independent from Buckley Sandler, which counts 21 of the 25 largest banks in the U.S. as well as the top 10 credit card issuers as clients.
The firm has also hit the jackpot in select contingency fee cases, which make up 5 to 10 percent of its portfolio. Sandler himself was lead counsel in a $554 million settlement in 2014 for the Navajo Nation from the U.S. government for mismanaging tribal trust funds.
But eventually—even for him—something had to give.
In an email to colleagues on Wednesday morning, Sandler wrote that after returning from a “wonderful family trip … I have reached the conclusion that it has become too difficult to continue to juggle my role as Chairman and Executive Partner of Buckley Sandler with my responsibilities leading Treliant Risk Advisors, Temerity Capital and Asurity Technologies and still have time to pursue my personal interests.”
In an interview, he acknowledged that stepping away from the firm is difficult. “I'm only comfortable doing this now because we have from Day One worked hard at institutionalizing the firm in terms of diversity of clients, business development and a strong, comprehensive leadership team,” he said.
It's an open question how the firm, a major player in representing companies before the now-defanged Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, will fare in the deregulatory Trump administration. But Benjamin Klubes, who along with John Kromer will continue to serve as the firm's co-managing partners, touted Buckley Sandler's state AG, white collar, licensing and Bank Secrecy Act-related practices. “We're optimistic about 2018 as our momentum continues,” he said.
With former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick on the stand for his second day of testimony, Charles Verhoeven of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan played the iconic “greed is good” speech that Douglas delivered while portraying the fictional corporate raider Gordon Gekko.
Hey look, they did enforcement!
The bank was represented by Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy partners James Cavoli and Tawfiq Rangwala.
“As vexing as the court finds the behavior of defendants and other 'serial objectors,' the court is unable to find that the alleged conduct constitutes racketeering activity,” the judge wrote.
Not Gibson Dunn's finest hour.
His departure from the FEC leaves four remaining commissioners and eliminates the Republicans' majority on the commission.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250