Jury Awards $417K Despite Facebook Posts of Injured Man Running Race
The plaintiff was able to overcome evidence including Facebook posts of him running a muddy obstacle course last year to land a post-apportionment verdict of $417,545.
April 23, 2018 at 04:14 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
The lawyer for a young man rear-ended when he stopped for a stalled vehicle on Interstate 285 felt good about his trial: The defendant admitted negligence, and medical evidence backed up claimed injuries of head trauma and a fractured hip.
But things appeared to go sideways when the defense produced Facebook photos of a chipper plaintiff working out and coated with mud as he competed in a 2017 obstacle course race.
There was also a report from emergency medical technicians indicating plaintiff Johnny Nguyen, 23, had been drinking, but he was not cited for driving under the influence and blamed any disorientation on the brain injury.
In the end, a DeKalb County jury nonetheless delivered Nguyen a post-apportionment award of $417,454 on April 19.
Jimmy Rice and James A. Rice Jr. P.C. associate Kimberly McGowan wrested a post-apportioned $417,454 award from the DeKalb County jury.
Rice said the Facebook pictures of Nguyen competing in a Tough Mudder race took him by surprise.
“It was one of those times when when you think the trial is going well,” Rice said.
It was during defense questioning of Nguyen when defense attorney Jay Patton, noting the young man had returned to playing tennis and basketball, asked whether he had resumed running.
Nguyen said “no,” recalled Rice, “and Jay said 'Are you sure?' Johnny said 'no, no,' and Jay went to his box and pulled out these pictures.”
“It was one of those times when the jurors put down their notebooks and really start to pay attention,” Rice said
Defendant Audria Leverett was represented by Patton of Taylor English Duma and associate Stephanie Cappezuto.
Patton said in an email that they are reviewing their options and have not decided whether there will be an appeal or other posttrial litigation.
Patton recalled the mud-laden obstacle course as a Spartan Race and said the Facebook postings would have packed a bigger punch if Nguyen claimed more serious physical injuries.
“On a back injury case, running a Spartan race would have been damning,” said Patton. “In our case, he sustained a traumatic closed head injury and testified to continuing memory issues. He also sustained small fracture (non-displaced) to his hip bone that he seemed to recover well from.”
The photos, he said, “showed him enjoying life. He is an athletic person, and it was consistent with who he was.”
According to Rice and trial documents, the crash happened in January 2016 when Nguyen's Honda Accord was stopped behind a stalled vehicle in the left lane of I-285 near LaVista Road. Leverett's Honda Civic plowed into Nguyen's car.
Nguyen's was taken by ambulance to Atlanta Medical Center and treated for a brain hemorrhage and hip fracture.
Nguyen sued Leverett in DeKalb County State Court.
According to his pleadings, Nguyen accrued more than $76,000 in medical bills and lost more than $6,000 in wages.
Prior to trial, Rice said the highest Nguyen's underinsured motorist carrier, State Farm, would offer was $50,000. The coverage limit was $200,000, and Nguyen offered to settle for $175,000, which was declined.
Trial started April 16 before DeKalb County State Court Judge Johnny Panos.
At trial, the defense argued that Nguyen should have activated his emergency four-way flashers when he stopped. There was also some dispute at trial as to whether Nguyen had hit the car in front of him or was knocked into it.
Rice said the jury took over three hours to award $430,365, apportioning 3 percent of the negligence to Nguyen, for a total award of $417,454.
In conversation afterward, Rice said jurors told him they had been “worried” by the Facebook postings, and did think he had hit the car in front of him first.
“That's why they gave him 3 percent negligence,” Rice said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Rule on MDLs Should Prompt Courts to Reevaluate Involvement in Settlement
6 minute readOne Lawyer's Health Scare Prompts a Reevaluation of Professionalism ... and Video Depositions
With Filing Deadlines Back in Place, Georgia Lawyers Brace for Flood of Stalled Litigation
Daily Dicta: In Flynn Case, Neomi Rao's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Opinion
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250