Boxer Floyd Mayweather, Hip Hop Producer DJ Khaled Settle SEC Claims
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced on Thursday that it has settled separate allegations that boxer Floyd Mayweather, Jr. and hip-hop producer DJ Khaled failed to disclose promotional payments from initial coin offering issuers.
November 29, 2018 at 07:10 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced Thursday that it has settled charges that boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. and hip-hop music producer DJ Khaled, real name Khaled Khaled, failed to disclose promotional payments from initial coin offering issuers in separate cases.
In the orders announcing the settlements, the SEC alleged that Mayweather failed to disclose promotional payments from three ICO issuers, including a $100,000 payment from Centra Technology, Inc. Additionally, the SEC order found that Mayweather didn't disclose that he was paid $200,000 to promote the other two ICOs.
The SEC also alleged that Khaled failed to disclose a $50,000 payment from Centra Tech.
Both men allegedly bragged about the payments on social media accounts, according to the news release.
The celebrities allegedly made the promotions after the SEC already had issued an investigative report in 2017 warning that coins sold in ICOs may be securities and that those who make offerings and sell them in the U.S. have to comply with federal securities laws.
“These cases highlight the importance of full disclosure to investors,” Enforcement Division Co-Director Stephanie Avakian said in the SEC news release. With no disclosure about the payments, Mayweather and Khaled's ICO promotions may have appeared to be unbiased, rather than paid endorsements.”
Without admitting to or denying the findings, Mayweather agreed to pay $300,000 in disgorgement, a $300,000 penalty and $14,775 in prejudgment interest.
Also without admitting or denying the charges, Khaled agreed to pay $50,000 in disgorgement, a $10,000 in penalty and $2,275 in prejudgment interest, according to the news release.
Both men agreed to not promote any kind of securities for three years. Mayweather further agreed to cooperate with the investigation.
Charles Spada of Lankler Siffert & Wohl in New York, attorney for Khaled, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Attorneys for Mayweather, James Sanders of Reed Smith in Los Angeles and Richard Wright of Wright Marsh & Levy in Las Vegas, also did not immediately respond to request for comment.
“Investors should be skeptical of investment advice posted to social media platforms, and should not make decisions based on celebrity endorsements,” Enforcement Division Co-Director Steven Peikin said in the news release.
“Social media influencers are often paid promoters, not investment professionals, and the securities they're touting, regardless of whether they are issued using traditional certificates or on the blockchain, could be frauds,” he said.
The SEC's continuing probe is being conducted by Alison R. Levine of the New York Regional Office and Jon A. Daniels, Luke M. Fitzgerald, and John O. Enright of the Enforcement Division's cyber unit and is being supervised by Cyber Unit Chief Robert A. Cohen, according to the commission.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250