Connecticut Law Tribune | News|Research
By Robert Storace | June 17, 2020
"Because of the pandemic people might look at risk differently," said attorney Mike D'Amico.
By Greg Land | June 12, 2020
The appellate opinion said the plaintiff's claims against Augusta University Medical Center were properly dismissed because the pre-suit notice seemingly misidentified where the alleged malpractice occurred.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Eric Poe | June 11, 2020
The Rules of Professional Conduct should provide the necessary clarity in guiding attorneys in matters of full and fair disclosure and representation of the doctor in a medical malpractice matter.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier | June 1, 2020
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier review pertinent executive orders that tolled statutes of limitations and analyze them in relation to the decisional law and prior executive orders issued in response to different emergencies.
By Charles Toutant | P.J. D'Annunzio | May 29, 2020
An Essex County Superior Court judge has approved a $12.5 million settlement in Ocasio v. Yeh, a medical malpractice suit on behalf of a child whose…
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Alan W. Clark | May 28, 2020
Courts must consider whether habit or circumstantial evidence belongs to the creative imagination of the party or attorney and is being used in such a way to unjustifiably excuse an act or omission of carelessness or negligence when the party has no recollection of the events.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Alan W. Clark | May 27, 2020
Can evidence of a health care provider's custom and practice be admissible at trial as habit evidence to prove a fact or standard of care? Can such evidence be proof in support of due care or lack thereof sufficient to support or oppose a motion for summary judgment for or against a party? Can such evidence arise from a creative imagination and be a poor excuse for medical negligence?
By Greg Land | May 21, 2020
The case is the first time Georgia's justices have been asked to decide whether a 30-year-old decision barring "wrongful birth" lawsuits applies to one of several cases involving a flawed sperm bank donor.
By Greg Land | May 21, 2020
The case is the first time Georgia's justices have been asked to decide whether a 30-year-old decision barring "wrongful birth" lawsuits applies to one of several cases involving a flawed sperm bank donor.
By Raychel Lean | May 21, 2020
The future of this lawsuit depended on whether the alleged "severe withdrawal" death of a South Florida patient fell under ordinary negligence or medical malpractice.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
Robert C. Gottlieb & Associates PLLC is a 40-year-old litigation boutique looking to hire a civil attorney who has concentrated in civil...
The County Counsel's Office is recruiting for a Litigation Attorney. These positions provide legal advice, assistance and representation in ...
Harter Secrest & Emery LLP is seeking a mid- to senior-level Employee Benefits attorney for the firm s Rochester, Buffalo or Albany offi...