Appellate Panel Affirms Buffalo Mayor's RICO Immunity in Development Suit
Despite offering its sympathies to the appellants, the Second Circuit panel said the racketeering and other claims by developer NRP Group were rightly dismissed by the district court.
February 20, 2019 at 04:29 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed a series of decisions by the district court that dismantled a suit that included RICO claims against the city of Buffalo and its mayor, Byron Brown, for allegedly improperly stymieing an affordable housing project because the developer wouldn't hire a politically connected contractor.
On appeal, the NRP Group challenged the final judgment by U.S. District Judge William Skretny of the Western District of New York in favor of Brown, his deputy mayor, the city, the Buffalo Urban Renewal League and others.
The panel struck a sympathetic note for the circumstances that led to the suit, stating that it was troubled by the implications of the actions it claimed city officials took against it.
“That evidence suggests that defendants' motives for scuttling the project—a development that, it appears, might have benefited low‐income individuals and families in Buffalo—stemmed from either caprice or a form of political engagement whose ethical valence seems dubious,” the panel stated. “Nonetheless, as a matter of law, we conclude that NRP's damages claims fail.”
The panel, composed of Circuit Judges Robert Sack, Barrington Parker and Susan Carney, agreed with the district court that NRP's civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claim is barred by legislative immunity protecting the legislative decision-making process of Brown and other city officials.
Likewise, NRP's claim for a “class of one” equal protection violation failed, the panel said. The company failed to sufficiently allege the existence of other developers and projects that were approved where it was not.
The company's breach of contract claim was unviable, the panel ruled, because NRP failed to show that either the city or the urban renewal authority had a contract in place, while also failing to meet the “stringent standard” of “manifest injustice” for claims for promissory estoppel under New York law.
Webster Szanyi partner Nelson Perel represented NRP Group on appeal. Brown and the other city officials were represented by Hagerty & Brady name attorney Michael Brady. Neither responded to a request for comment.
A spokesman for Brown's office likewise did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250