Helicopter Industry Restructurings Connected to Oil Market
In his Bankruptcy Update, Edward E. Neiger focuses on recent restructurings in the helicopter industry, including Waypoint Leasing, PHI and Bristow Group, as the industry reacts to a years-long drop in oil prices and corresponding reduced demand for aviation services by offshore oil and gas operators.
May 29, 2019 at 12:45 PM
6 minute read
This issue of the Bankruptcy Update focuses on recent restructurings in the helicopter industry, including Waypoint Leasing, PHI and Bristow Group, as the industry reacts to a years-long drop in oil prices and corresponding reduced demand for aviation services by offshore oil and gas operators.
|'Waypoint Leasing'
On Nov. 25, 2018, helicopter leasing company Waypoint Leasing Holdings Ltd. and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Waypoint Leasing Holdings (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-13648).
Formed in 2013 with funding from investment firms run by George Soros and Michael Dell, the debtors owned 165 helicopters and leased them to offshore oil and gas rigs and emergency search and rescue operators. Recently, Waypoint's revenues dropped off as energy companies lacked funding to fly personnel back and forth from oil rigs, leading to a liquidity crisis. As of October 2018, the debtors reported a net loss of approximately $52 million and had approximately $1.23 billion in liabilities, including $1.1 billion in funded debt.
Waypoint, together with a committee of its secured lenders, began exploring an asset sale in August 2018 and reported engagement with six potential bidders as of the petition date. On Dec. 10, 2018, the debtors filed a motion seeking approval of bidding procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all of their assets. Macquarie Rotorcraft Leasing was selected as the stalking horse bidder with a $650 million bid for substantially all of the debtors' assets, including 165 helicopters.
On Feb. 12, 2019, the court held a hearing in connection with the sale motion and approved a series of sales which most notably included a sale of 130 helicopters to Macquarie for $445 million. The court also approved sales to Waypoint's secured lenders Lombard North Central and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation who each bid on the collateral (17 helicopters each) securing their respective debt facilities. The sales were approved over objections by Macquarie, who argued that Lombard violated confidentiality restrictions by discussing the resale of helicopters to a third party. Subsequently, on March 7, 2019, Lombard sold the acquired assets to LCI Helicopters. On April 3, 2019, Macquarie commenced litigation against LCI arguing it engaged in discussions prohibited by the non-disclosure agreement governing the Waypoint bidding process.
|'PHI'
On March 15, 2019, helicopter operator PHI Inc. and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. PHI Inc. (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30923).
The company, founded in 1949 as Petroleum Helicopters, has more than 2,000 employees and operates in 45 countries. The debtors have 230 aircraft with approximately half employed to transport crew to and from offshore oil and gas rigs and the other half used to provide medical transportation in the United States. PHI attributed its bankruptcy filing to a long cyclical downturn in the oil and gas markets that, in turn, caused customers to cut back on helicopter use. In addition, a $126 million purchase of competitor HNZ Group in late 2017 exacerbated the debtors' liquidity concerns.
As of the petition date, the debtors reported approximately $700 million in secured debt, including $500 million in notes with an impending maturity date and a $70 million term loan from Blue Torch Capital that the company obtained immediately prior to the bankruptcy filing to fund operations in Chapter 11.
On April 1, 2019, the debtors filed their proposed plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement. The plan generally contemplates a balance sheet deleveraging transaction through the issuance of shares of the reorganized debtors' new common equity to holders of certain secured and unsecured claims, a $70 million new money equity investment through a rights offering available to certain holders of unsecured notes claims, aircraft lessor claims and general unsecured claims to the extent such holders vote to accept the plan, entry into a new $150 million asset-backed exit facility, and entry into an exit facility provided by Blue Torch Capital, modifying its prepetition facility.
The plan drew immediate opposition from the official committee of unsecured creditors and all major stakeholders agreed to participate in a judicial mediation to attempt to break the deadlock over the terms of the plan. Contemporaneously with this process, the official committee of unsecured creditors filed a motion seeking to terminate the debtors' exclusive period to file and solicit a plan so that it could file and prosecute its own plan. A hearing in connection with the committee's motion to terminate exclusivity is scheduled for June 5, 2019.
|'Bristow Group'
On May 12, 2019, aviation services company Bristow Group and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Bristow Group (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-32713).
The debtors have about 3,000 employees and operate across the globe providing personnel transport and search and rescue services to oil and gas companies with offshore operations. Similarly to Waypoint and PHI, Bristow suffered from the consequences of a years-long drop in oil prices that decreased demand for aviation services. In addition to the above-described industry financial pressures, Bristow was burdened by a failed $560 million acquisition of competitor Columbia Helicopters which led to shareholder litigation.
The debtors report in excess of $1.7 billion in liabilities, including almost $1 billion in secured debt and approximately $750 million in unsecured debt.
The debtors entered bankruptcy armed with a restructuring support agreement with the majority of their senior secured noteholders. The restructuring support agreement lays out the framework for a plan whereby certain secured lenders would receive the majority of stake in the reorganized debtors and backstop a $200 million equity offering and provide a $75 million debtor-in-possession loan to finance operations under Chapter 11.
Notably, the debtors' unsecured noteholders are not parties to the restructuring support agreement and an ad hoc group of unsecured noteholders has already filed pleadings setting out its opposition to the proposed restructuring framework. The unsecured noteholder group argues that the debtors' enterprise value is significantly higher than what the debtors assert causing potential unsecured noteholder recoveries to be artificially reduced. In the absence of a consensual resolution, this disagreement will likely result in a protracted valuation battle.
Edward E. Neiger is a co-managing partner at ASK LLP, a national law firm focusing on bankruptcy law. He can be reached at [email protected]. Marianna Udem, partner at the firm, assisted in the preparation of this column.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250