NJ Previews What May Lie Ahead for NY Employers Under the State's Amended Whistleblower Law
With its recent amendment, New York's law now matches—and in some ways, exceeds—the longstanding protections of New Jersey's CEPA.
February 25, 2022 at 02:00 PM
8 minute read
An amendment to New York Labor Law §740, effective Jan. 26, 2022, significantly expands protections for workers who report or object to their employer's illegal or dangerous business activities. While the impact of these changes is yet to be determined, the body of case law that has developed across the Hudson River in New Jersey, which has had some of the most comprehensive whistleblower protections in the country for several years now, is an instructive starting point for those looking to anticipate the impact of New York's whistleblower amendment.
While both New York and New Jersey have had whistleblower laws on their books for over 30 years, the trajectory of their respective laws has been divergent until now. Since its enactment in 1984, the New York whistleblower law has been narrowly construed, infrequently invoked, and, as a result, has generated little precedent. The same cannot be said of New Jersey's Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA). Enacted in 1986, CEPA has been more broadly interpreted, is frequently invoked, and has been extensively litigated—comprising a major aspect of New Jersey employment law.
With its recent amendment, New York's law now matches—and in some ways, exceeds—the longstanding protections of New Jersey's CEPA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6d/24/0db683694a68a210dab2e7f555ed/ai-prompt-engineering-767x633.jpg)
Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
9 minute read![Anti-Abortion Groups' Challenge to New York's 'Boss Bill' Is Returning to Federal Trial Court Anti-Abortion Groups' Challenge to New York's 'Boss Bill' Is Returning to Federal Trial Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2022/09/second-circuit-court-appeals-767x633-2.jpg)
Anti-Abortion Groups' Challenge to New York's 'Boss Bill' Is Returning to Federal Trial Court
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250