Crypto Swords and Shields: Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Strategies for Crypto Exchanges
Crypto exchanges can use the unique features of blockchain technologies to their own ends, including developing effective countermeasures to detect and thwart crypto laundering schemes.
March 09, 2022 at 12:30 PM
7 minute read
Crypto exchanges have become a tool of choice for would-be crypto "money" launderers. In late January, the AI analytics firm Chainalysis estimated that "cybercriminals have laundered over $33 billion worth of cryptocurrency since 2017, with most of the total over time moving to centralized exchanges." Chainalysis, DeFi Takes on Bigger Role in Money Laundering But Small Group of Centralized Services Still Dominate (Jan. 26, 2022). The outsized role of crypto exchanges in crypto laundering was recently highlighted in the DOJ's spectacular announcement that it had seized 94,636 Bitcoin (BTC), at the time worth approximately $4.18 billion, and charged a Manhattan couple with conspiring to launder the stolen BTC through various crypto exchanges. U.S. Department of Justice, Two Arrested for Alleged Conspiracy To Launder $4.5 Billion in Stolen Cryptocurrency (Feb. 8, 2022). Crypto has long been seen as particularly susceptible to money laundering activities due to its anonymity and independence from traditional cash routes and their attendant regulations. As alleged in the DOJ's complaint and the accompanying statement of facts, the couple deployed various "sophisticated laundering techniques," including using multiple false identities, opening multiple accounts, and depositing crypto at multiple exchanges on multiple blockchains to break up the fund flow and conceal the transaction history. U.S. v. Lichtenstein, Case No. 22-mj-22 (RMM) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2022); Statement of Facts (Dkt. No. 1-1). But crypto exchanges can use the unique features of blockchain technologies to their own ends, including developing effective countermeasures to detect and thwart crypto laundering schemes.
Cross-Platform Know Your Customer (KYC) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD). Obtaining and validating customer information to create accurate customer profiles and conduct customer risk rating is anti-money laundering 101. Crypto exchanges can double the effectiveness of this practice if all services running on the same blockchain (e.g., other exchanges, custodial lending, etc.) use consistent CDD and KYC standards. Traditional KYC information generally includes the user's name, government-issued ID, and home address. Crypto KYC should also include the user's registered devices and primary IP address. User's bank accounts linked to crypto wallets can be used for CDD to corroborate information for identity verification. Higher-risk users, such as those in higher-risk jurisdictions or using higher-risk assets (discussed in part 3, below) should be subject to Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD), such as a live video chat with the user to verify his identity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCommon Law Liability at Construction Sites and the 'Launching a Force' Test
22 minute read'We Are Becoming Scapegoats': One Year Post-SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Updates and Impacting Rulings
A New Era of Influence: A Swift Take on Branding, Computer-Generated Influencers and Deepfakes
9 minute readChallenges to Noncompete Ban Already Hitting Courts, Setting Up Showdown Over FTC's Powers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250