Foreign Residents Have New Opportunities to Sue in US Courts for RICO Violations
This article discusses the Smagin v. Yegiazaryan case and addresses how circumstances under which compensable domestic RICO injuries may arise can provide guidance to would-be foreign-based putative plaintiffs in determining whether the circumstances in their cases give rise to domestic RICO injuries.
August 24, 2023 at 12:00 PM
8 minute read
There was a time was when there was no special limitation on non-U.S. parties bringing claims in U.S. courts for treble damages for violations of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C 1964(c), other than ordinary jurisdictional requirements.
In European Community v. RJR Nabisco, 579 U.S. 325, 334 (2016), however, the U.S. Supreme Court—applying the presumption against extraterritoriality as a canon of construction under which, "in the absence of congressional intent to the contrary, federal law will be construed to have only domestic application"—limited the extent to which foreign parties may obtain civil damages under RICO. It did not apply the presumption to the extraterritorial application of RICO in criminal cases, but found it to be applicable to RICO Section 1964(c), which permits lawsuits for the recovery of treble damages and attorney fees for persons injured by violations of RICO.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCome Fly With Me: DOJ’s Proposed FARA Amendments and the Tourism Industry
10 minute read'Headaches,' Opportunities Ahead for Lawyers Advising Foreign Businesses, Attorneys Say
4 minute readNuclear Weapons and International Law: Associated Risks and the Role of Law
4 minute readLessons Learned From the Pager Attack: the Law of War, Warfighting, and the Weaponization of the Supply Chain
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250