Jonathan Bick

November 06, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Jonathan Bick discusses the process of holding an AI accountable for any bad acts it may have caused. He writes: "Since an AI is not a legal entity, it may avoid being held accountable for its bad acts because it cannot be a party to a court proceeding. However, an AI may be the object of a court proceeding…which would place it under the jurisdiction of a court and that court may transfer the AI to the plaintiff and thereby ameliorating the difficulties associated with an AI's bad acts."

By Jonathan Bick

5 minute read

September 24, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Having a clearly delineated AI product agreement can limit AI software product liability.

By Jonathan Bick

6 minute read

August 22, 2024 | New York Law Journal

AI differs from traditional software, perhaps requiring novel admissibility considerations.

By Jonathan Bick

9 minute read

June 20, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Since it may be argued that a lawyer's decision not to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) is unethical, and the improper use of AI may also be unethical, it is important that attorneys become cognizant of the application of legal ethics to AI. The first step toward AI use ethical compliance is the timely disclosure of AI use particularly related to generative AI tools. Such a step is likely to ameliorate or eliminate many AI use legal ethics difficulties.

By Jonathan Bick

7 minute read

March 25, 2024 | New York Law Journal

While laws and regulations may lag innovation, Internet laws and regulations are likely to be valuable guides to Artificial Intelligence legislation. Due to the similarities of Internet technology and AI technology, Internet law options and implementation strategies are expected to be applicable to AI legislation.

By Jonathan Bick

6 minute read

February 27, 2024 | New York Law Journal

A discussion of the legal and ethical implications of AI.

By Jonathan Bick

10 minute read

December 01, 2023 | New Jersey Law Journal

While existing business and technological options exist to address AI cybersecurity issues and ameliorate the adverse effects of AI cybersecurity difficulties, AI programmer protection requires amending cybersecurity legal defenses.

By Jonathan Bick

6 minute read

July 31, 2023 | New Jersey Law Journal

While the use of AI for writing may enhance creative analysis and identification of persuasive precedents, such use may also violate legal ethics rules, including the duty of competence, the duty of confidentiality and assisting in the unauthorized practice of law.

By Jonathan Bick

6 minute read

July 11, 2023 | New Jersey Law Journal

The primary legal difficulty associated with AI training is the acquisition and use of training data without the consent of the owner of said training data.

By Jonathan Bick

6 minute read

June 20, 2023 | New Jersey Law Journal

Most agree that internet deepfake content is widespread and may be used to manipulate the public, attack personal rights, infringe intellectual property and cause personal data difficulties. However, little agreement exists as to who is legally liable for internet AI deepfake content.

By Jonathan Bick

7 minute read