Filter This View

  • Landrum v. Mitchell

    Publication Date: 2010-11-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-04
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 06-4194 & 4251

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: April 21, 2009Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.OPINIONWarden Betty Mitchel

  • American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense

    Publication Date: 2005-10-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Hellerstein The American Civil Liberties Union and other plaintiffs have demanded that the government produce r

  • Lourdes Maria Vargas De Damian v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2011-09-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-08-31
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Anne Gardner Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 02-08-00210-CV

    OPINIONI. IntroductionAppellants*fn1 filed this lawsuit against Appellee Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.*fn2 on January 25

  • Smith v. Smith, 13366/99

    Publication Date: 2006-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-06-20
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: William Giacomo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 13366/99

    WESTCHESTER COUNTY Supreme Court Neveen M. Nesheiwat Richard A. Danzig Danzig Fishman & Decea Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection for

  • Cacchillo v. Insmed Inc., 1:10-CV-01199

    Publication Date: 2013-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Thomas J. McAvoy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1:10-CV-01199

    Cite as: Cacchillo v. Insmed Inc., 1:10-CV-01199, NYLJ 1202589054540, at *1 (NDNY, Decided February 19, 2013)District Judge Thomas J. McAvoyp class="

  • Jeffrey Hodge, Plaintiff v. Village of Southampton, et al., Defendants, 09-cv-2606 (JFB) (WDW)

    Publication Date: 2012-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented by David Schlacter, Law Offices of David Schlachter, Uniondale, NY.
    for defendant: The attorneys for the defendants Jeltje DeJong, Joshua S. Shteierman, and Kelly E. Wright, Devitt Spellman Barrett, LLP, Smithtown, NY.
    Case Number: 09-cv-2606 (JFB) (WDW)

    Cite as: Jefferey Hodge v. Versus Village of Southampton, 09-cv-2606 (JFB) (WDW), NYLJ 1202540477160, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 20, 2012)Distr

  • Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd. v. Simatelex Manufactory Co. Ltd, 01 Civ. 1044

    Publication Date: 2007-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-03-29
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Richard Howell
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01 Civ. 1044

    District Judge Richard J. Holwell U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff: William Dunnegan, Esq. Perkins & Dunnegan

  • US v. NYC Bd. of Educ., 08-5171-cv (L)

    Publication Date: 2011-05-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Calabresi, Raggi, and Cudahy,1 C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael E. Rosman (Christopher J. Hajec, on the brief), Center for Individual Rights, Washington, DC, for John Brennan, James Ahearn, Scott Spring, Dennis Mortensen, John Mitchell, Eric Schauer, and Ruben Miranda. Gregory B. Friel, (Dennis J. Dimsey and April J. Anderson, on the brief) for Loretta King, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the United States, the Attorney General, the Assistant Attorney General, and the Department of Justice. Araceli Martinez-Olguin, (Emily J. Martin and Lenora M. Lapidus, on the brief), American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Women's Right's Project, New York, NY, for Janet Caldero et al. Matthew Colangelo, (John Payton, Debo P. Adegbile, and Joy Milligan, on the brief), NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., New York, NY; Joshua Civin, NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, Washington, DC, for Pedro Arroyo et al. Rachael N. Pine, Gillian L. Thomas, Legal Momentum, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae Legal Momentum.
    for defendant: The New York City Department of Education, the City of New York, Martha K. Hirst, and the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services, did not appear at oral argument and did not submit a brief.
    Case Number: 08-5171-cv (L)

    Cite as: US v. NYC Bd. of Educ., 08-5171-cv (L), NYLJ 1202493194832, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 5, 2011)Before: Calabresi, Raggi, and Cudahy,1

  • Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden, 2011-0902

    Publication Date: 2012-02-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Tompkins County
    Judge: Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Petitioner-Plaintiff, Anschutz Exploration Corp. By: Thomas S. West, Esq., Yvonne E. Hennessey, Esq., The West Firm, PLLC, Albany, NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Respondents-Defendants, Town of Dryden and Town of Dryden Town Board By: Mahlon R. Perkins, Esq., Mahlon R. Perkins, P.C., Dryden, NY.
    Case Number: 2011-0902

    Cite as: Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden, 2011-0902, NYLJ 1202543296306, at *1 (Sup., TO, Decided February 21, 2012)Ju

  • S.H.R. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

    Publication Date: 2012-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-20
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Jim Sharp Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 01-10-00999-CV

    OPINIONAppellant S.H.R.'s parental rights to his three minor children were terminated after a bench trial. In three issues, appellant contends that the evidence was legally and factual