Evidence

  • New York Law Journal

    Unrung Bells and the Quick-Peek Order  

    By Thomas G. Rohback and Brooke Oppenheimer | February 2, 2018

    Grappling with the delays and discovery motions, courts have fashioned more creative discovery processes. One such mechanism is the “quick-peek” agreement. Viewed as a mechanism for parties to exchange data quickly without the fear of waiving privilege or its subject matter, courts started to consider the mandatory use of the quick-peek to streamline discovery in 2014.

  • New York Law Journal | Analysis

    Take a Break With This Evidence Quiz

    By Michael J. Hutter | January 30, 2018

    Evidence columnist Michael J. Hutter presents an evidence quiz. Take a break and see if you know evidence as well as the judges before whom you will be appearing.

  • New York Law Journal

    Decisions Highlight Risk of Unintended Implied Waivers of Privilege

    By David Siegal and Michael Scanlon | January 26, 2018

    White-collar attorneys will continue to employ the attorney proffer to advance their clients' interests in responding to investigations, even while on occasion accepting the consequence of some limited waiver of privilege over the facts they strategically divulge.

  • New York Law Journal

    Preserving Privilege in Government Investigations in Light of 'SEC v. Herrera'

    By Boyd Johnson, Brendan McGuire and Alyssa DaCunha | January 26, 2018

    In terms of practical impact, the decision in 'SEC v. Herrera' appears to expand the scope of materials that may be obtained as a result of actual waiver through disclosure, and further blurs the line between subject matter waiver and actual waiver. Both results unfortunately provide potent new tools for litigants seeking to obtain materials previously considered privileged.

  • New York Law Journal | News

    Judge Recommends Stiff Sanctions for NYPD's 'Pattern' of Delay, Noncompliance

    By Colby Hamilton | January 25, 2018

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl Pollak said the city "should be concerned" over the procedures in place to make sure interactions with police are being appropriately handled.

  • New York Law Journal | News

    Judge Urges Action to Curb 'Overbroad' Digital Search Warrants

    By Andrew Denney | January 24, 2018

    Overbroad search warrants for digital evidence are “all too common” in New York, are often green-lighted by busy judges who are focused on processing motions and are the product of a system based on outdated statutes, a Manhattan judge said in a ruling to suppress warrants for evidence in a murder case.

  • New York Law Journal | Analysis

    The Balance in Testimonial Privileges

    By Thomas F. Gleason | January 17, 2018

    In his New York Practice column, Thomas F. Gleason discusses 'Ambac Assurance v. Countrywide Home Loans', which provides an informative history of the attorney-client privilege, including the evolution of the “joint defense” doctrine.

  • New York Law Journal | Analysis

    Cross-Racial Witness Identification: A Review of 'People v. Boone'

    By Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. | January 16, 2018

    In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. discuss 'People v. Boone', in which the Court of Appeals held that, in a case in which a witness's identification of the defendant is at issue, and the identifying witness and defendant appear to be of different races, a trial court is required to give, upon request, a jury charge on the cross-race effect during final instructions.

  • New York Law Journal | Analysis

    2018: The Year New York Implements Meaningful Criminal Justice Reform?

    By Elizabeth S. Kase and Brian T. McCarthy | January 16, 2018

    Elizabeth S. Kase and Brian T. McCarthy write: By articulating specific guidelines for trial courts and the potential for sanctions against non-compliant prosecutors, New York is poised to implement sweeping procedural changes in 2018, but will the enumerated changes have true meaningful impact for criminal defendants?

  • New York Law Journal | Analysis

    Lying in Wait to Move Under Rule 37(c)(1)

    By Samuel N. Fraidin and Peter R. Jerdee | January 12, 2018

    Samuel N. Fraidin and Peter R. Jerdee write: Where a party has failed to disclose information required under Rules 26(a) or (e), an order precluding the party from introducing evidence at trial may be an appropriate sanction under Rule 37(c)(1). But preclusion is not automatic. Courts in the Second Circuit are likely to deny a motion to preclude where the movant has waited silently until discovery closes to raise the nondisclosure.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER VACANCY MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Refer to: www.ca3.uscourts.gov for detailed announcement...


Apply Now ›

The Business Litigation Group of the Boston office of McCarter & English seeks a litigation associate with 3-5 years of business litigat...


Apply Now ›

McCarter and English is actively seeking a trusts and estates associate for our Newark, NJ office with 3-5 years of experience in estate pla...


Apply Now ›