Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
19 results for '* topic:"Discovery"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-09-24
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: Circuit Judge Richard J. Sullivan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-CV-6903
Deposition, Document Production Granted in Suit Over Ejectment From Basketball Game
Publication Date: 2024-09-04
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge Katherine H. Parker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1:24-MC-00311
Motion to Compel Production Denied; Extrajudicial Communication Not Privileged
Publication Date: 2024-09-04
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Margaret M. Garnett
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-MC-00354
Discovery for Swiss Lawsuit Granted As Against JPMorgan Chase, Truist Banks Only
Publication Date: 2024-08-26
Practice Area: Copyrights | Discovery
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Richard C. Wesley
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Bruce W. Bellingham, Spector Gadon Rosen Vinci, PC, Philadelphia, PA.
for defendant: Peter E. Perkowski, Perkowski Legal, PC, Los Angeles, CA, for American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., North American Nature Photography Association, American Photographic Artists, The National Press Photographers Association, Xposure Photo Agency Inc., Okularity, Inc., as amici curiae
For Defendants-Appellees: Paul Niehaus, Craig Tarasoff, on the brief, Emily B. Kirsch, Kirsch & Niehaus PLLC, New York, NY.
Case Number: 23-1071
No 'Sophisticated Plaintiff' Exception to Discovery Rule in Copyright Infringement Action
Publication Date: 2024-08-22
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Katharine H. Parker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-CV-5974
Document Request from Non-Party Is Sufficiently Narrow, Seeks Relevant Information
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Gary L. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-08-20
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: Howard A Newman, Esq., Newman Law Offices, Washington, DC.
for defendant: Kathleen Rose Fitzpatrick, Esq., KRF Legal, Brooklyn, NY.
Attorneys for Defendants: Peter Brown, Esq., Peter Brown & Associates PLLC, New York, NY.
Case Number: 24-CV-00013
Discovery Is Necessary Regarding Defendants' Copyright Infringement Counterclaim
Publication Date: 2024-08-06
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
Industry: Education | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Ann M. Donnelly
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-CV-4245
No Basis Exists to Overturn Order Staying Discovery Pending Amendment, Dismissal Motion
Publication Date: 2024-08-05
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Edgardo Ramos
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-CV-9170
Firm Is Entitled to Attorney's Fees, Costs as Sanction for Discovery Stalled Since 2020
Publication Date: 2024-07-29
Practice Area: Discovery | Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Applicant-Appellant: Carolyn B. Lamm, Kristen M. Young, Nicolle E. Kownacki, White & Case, Washington, D.C., on the brief, Hansel Pham, Washington, D.C.
for defendant: For Appellees: Mélida N. Hodgson, Mitchell R. Stern, Nathan A. King, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, New York, New York; Eli Whitney Debevoise II, Sally L. Pei, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for Intervenor-Appellee; Raymond DeLuca, Jeffery Mullen, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Rachel B. Soloman, Cozen O'Connor, New York, New York, on the brief, for Respondent-Appellee, Samuel Lonergan, New York, New York.
For amicus curiae United States of America in support of affirmance: Bryan M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Sharon Swingle, Appellate Staff Attorney, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Damian Williams, United States Attorney, on the brief, Urja Mittal, Appellate Staff Attorney, Washington, D.C.
Case Number: 23-73
ICSID Tribunal Lacks Government Authority Warranting Discovery Under 28 USC §1782
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read