NEXT

Latest Stories

October 17, 2012 | New York Law Journal

Applying Collateral Estoppel in Attorney Discipline Cases

Jeff Henle, principal attorney at Jeff Henle, P.C., writes: It is remarkable that in attorney discipline cases, if the attorney was previously found guilty of wrongdoing before a judge or panel, the Appellate Division determines what, if any, punishment is to be dispensed without the benefit of witness testimony or oral argument.
12 minute read
January 28, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Protecting Judges Remains Top Priority For the OCA

7 minute read
November 01, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Brown Raysman Set To Merge Next Month With Thelen Reid

3 minute read
September 22, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Judge Upholds Environmental Review of Armory Plan

6 minute read
July 09, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Law and Children

Professor Andrew Schepard and attorney and clinical instructor Theo Liebmann of Hofstra University School of Law analyze what are some of the most passionately contested proceedings in Family Court.
13 minute read
April 29, 2003 | New York Law Journal

1031 Exchanges

8 minute read
August 12, 2009 | New York Law Journal

News In Brief

7 minute read
February 20, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Surrogate's Practice and Proceedings

Charles F. Gibbs, a partner at Holland & Knight, and John J. Reddy Jr., a partner at Bekerman & Reddy, write that Surrogate Margarita L�pez Torres of Kings County recently ruled that a beneficiary violated the in terrorem clause in the testator's will by conducting a pre-objection deposition of a person not exempted by SCPA 1404(4). The court ruled that the beneficiary forfeited his legacy despite his never having filed objections.
10 minute read
October 28, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Marketplace

The government of the Republic of Singapore has purchased a new headquarters for its mission to the United Nations, at 318 E. 48th St., for $29.5 million. Also, engineering and architectural firm STV Inc. signed a renewal and expansion at Orda Management's 225 and 233 Park Ave. So., properties that interconnect on several floors.
3 minute read
April 30, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Ninth Circuit Expands the Debate Over 'Collective Scienter' Issue

Robert Malionek, a partner at Latham & Watkins, and Joseph Salama, an associate at the firm, write: To the extent Dynex was destined to put an end to the debate concerning the viability of "collective scienter" theory in the Second Circuit, the Ninth Circuit's decision in Glazer likely will prevent that from happening for no reason other than its statement that the Second Circuit adopted a theory of "collective scienter." However, the Ninth Circuit neither defined "collective scienter," nor explained how the Second Circuit endorsed it in Dynex. Thus, we continue to believe that Dynex signals the Second Circuit's rejection of both the "collective knowledge" and "collective conduct" variants of the "collective scienter" theory.
11 minute read