Effects of 'Trupia' in Applying Assumption of Risk Doctrine
Emina Poricanin, an appellate court attorney for the Fourth Department, writes: The most obvious effect of the Court of Appeals' decision in Trupia is that the courts will be confined in using the doctrine of primary assumption of risk to athletic and recreational activities, leaving injuries in other contexts open to comparative fault analysis and preventing dismissal of such cases. Clearly, Trupia will have a pro-plaintiff effect.Circuit Upholds Attorney Ouster In Bankruptcy
Case Law: Anti-Waiver Provision, Failure to Register, Vicarious Liability
In his Franchising column, David J. Kaufmann, senior partner at Kaufmann Gildin Robbins & Oppenheim, reviews recent decisions that indirectly held that a franchisor commits no wrongdoing by requiring a franchisee to disclaim fraudulent representations in the franchise agreement and thereafter relying on that disclaimer as an affirmative defense, and that buck the 15-year-old judicial trend that a franchisor that does not control the day-to-day operations of its franchisee.Use of 'Disparaging' in Order Called Too Vague for Contempt
A Long Island judge has thrown out criminal contempt charges against a divorcing man who purportedly violated an order of protection's prohibition against making "disparaging remarks" about his wife.Law Firms Denied Permission to Leave Sex Bias Suit
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250