Latest Stories
Matter of Briffel, appellants v. County of Nassau, respondents
RPTL �1805(1) Does Not Require County to Limit Increases in Full Market Valuation of PropertySchaefer, plaintiff-appellant v. Town of Victor, defendants-appellees
Landfill Operator Could Seek Indemnity Under CERCLA But Did Not Meet Its Time Limit for Remedial ActionsArnold's Wines Inc., plaintiffs-appellants v. Boyle, defendants-appellees
Free With Registration: New York's Ban on Direct Consumer Sales by Out-of-State Liquor Sellers Does Not Violate Commerce Clause, Satisfies Twenty-First AmendmentLerner, plaintiffs-appellants v. Fleet Bank NA, defendants-appellees
Same Chain of Causation May Support Proximate Cause for RICO Claim, Not for Common-Law ClaimNew York's Prohibition of Vertical Price-Fixing
Jay L. Himes, the chief of the antitrust bureau of the Office of the Attorney General of New York, writes that under state law, minimum vertical price-fixing is a per se antitrust violation that violates the Donnelly Act in and of itself, without any need for inquiry into market conditions or other circumstances. Where use of an RPM provision causes purchasers to be overcharged, the injury should be recoverable under the Donnelly Act's treble damage provision.Trending Stories
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
