NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for '*'

You can use to get even better search results
June 04, 2003 | New York Law Journal

B. A. v. L. A.

22 minute read
Defabio v. Rusinsky, 09-4407-cv
Publication Date: 2010-10-14
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Leval, B.D. Parker, Hall, C.JJ.
Case number: No. 09-4407-cv

Cite as: Defabio v. Rusinsky, 09-4407-cv, NYLJ 1202473309512, at *1 (2d Cir, Decided October 13, 2010)Before: Leval, B.D. Parker, Hall, C.JJ.p class="decid

May 31, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Court to Decide Preemption Matter In Harassment Action

6 minute read
February 02, 2006 | New York Law Journal

'Storm Warnings' Ignored; Late Suit by Investor Rejected

A plaintiff who claimed that his investment in Morgan Stanley stock was damaged because of the alleged conflict of interest of the firm's analysts waited too long to file his complaint, a federal appeals court has ruled. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the dismissal of Sandip Shah's case, saying Mr. Shah was on "inquiry" notice that Morgan Stanley analysts might be laboring under a conflict of interest more than a year before he filed suit.
5 minute read
June 20, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Meet the New Mid-Hudson Valley Bar Leaders

Approximately 3,800 members are served by the Dutchess, Orange, Rockland and Westchester bar groups. Here, meet the new presidents of those associations, and discover their goals for the coming year.
3 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book New Jersey Business Litigation 2025 Authors: Paul A. Rowe, Andrea J. Sullivan View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

August 02, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Tax Tips

Sidney Kess, a CPA and attorney, reports that the IRS has issued 88 new questions and answers designed to provide comprehensive guidance on health savings accounts in response to public inquiries.
5 minute read
May 01, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Insurance Fraud

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, writes: The payment or rejection of claims is a part of the regular business of insurance companies. Toward that end, carriers rely on a wide variety of processes and individuals to determine whether claims should be paid or denied, or whether particular claims are fraudulent. In many instances, an insurer will exercise its right under an insurance policy to have its attorneys conduct an examination under oath (EUO) of an insured. An issue that commonly arises is whether a report, letter, or other documents prepared by counsel following an EUO are discoverable by the insured in the event the claim is denied and litigation ensues.
9 minute read
January 05, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Big Four Auditors' Legal Services Hit By Sarbanes-Oxley

7 minute read
August 12, 2009 | New York Law Journal

NBA Harmed As 'Victim' In Scandal, Circuit Finds

4 minute read
September 08, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Dismissed Partner Sues Holland & Knight For Fraud, Age Bias

8 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.