NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for '*'

You can use to get even better search results
August 23, 2012 | New York Law Journal

Judge Seems Skeptical of Grads' Suit Against Brooklyn Law Over Job Stats

Most of the hearing on the school's motion to dismiss centered on its claim that 91.3 percent of the class of 2009 was employed nine months after graduation. The plaintiffs allege that this figure was deceptive because it included students in any type of job, not just those in legal jobs, plus graduates in temporary or volunteer positions.
7 minute read
April 23, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Marketplace

Health-care provider HIP has signed a 20-year lease for 47,000 square feet at Phase II of the Granite Buildings at 1991 Marcus Ave. in New Hyde Park. The space will be used for a new multipurpose medical center. Also, Australian financial advisory firm Macquarie Holdings has signed a 10-year lease at the Metropolitan Tower, 125 W. 55th St.
4 minute read
July 14, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Eastern District Roundup

Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, report on several significant decisions handed down recently in the Eastern District, including one giving claimants in a quasi-class action a 40-day deadline to submit properly documented claim forms, and another using the All Writs Act to prevent improper interference with a court-appointed monitor whose term had expired.
10 minute read
February 24, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Sentencing Rules Found Not Retroactive to Initial Habeas Appeal

3 minute read
November 23, 2004 | New York Law Journal

'Crawford': Bright-Line Rule on Confrontation in Sex Assault Trials

Paul DerOhannesian II, a partner at DerOhannesian & DerOhannesian, writes that trial practitioners must beware of the pitfalls in objecting to hearsay statements. A general hearsay objection, an evidentiary objection, does not preserve for appellate review an objection based on the Confrontation Clause.
12 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

February 21, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Ruling Near on Securities Fraud Pleading Standards

Gregg L. Weiner, a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, writes that the Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear a securities fraud pleading case that will address the standard for measuring whether the facts alleged in the complaint are sufficient to create a "strong inference" that the defendant acted with fraudulent intent. It is difficult to predict how the Supreme Court will resolve the question, and what impact the Court's two new members will have.
12 minute read
August 11, 2010 | New York Law Journal

Court Allows Testifying Doctors to Rely on Third-Party Records

Jeffrey S. Siegel, a partner at Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, and Mitchell S. Lustig, an associate at the firm, write that in a recent decision that is an obvious boon to the New York no-fault insurer, the Appellate Term, Second Department, expressly allowed a peer review doctor to testify based upon review of medical records prepared by third-party providers that were not in evidence, despite the hearsay objections of the plaintiff's counsel.
15 minute read
September 20, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Long Island: Briefly Noted

4 minute read
June 14, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, writes that corporations and corporate law issues have been featured recently in a number of significant decisions by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in cases arising on Long Island.
7 minute read
April 09, 2009 | New York Law Journal

New Rules for Harassment Claims in New York City

Jonathan L. Sulds, a shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, reviews two recent decisions that alter the landscape for New York City workplace harassment law: in one, an Appellate Division panel held that the long-standing federal standard for determining whether there exists actionable harassment because of a hostile work environment, namely that incidents are "severe and pervasive," does not apply to claims brought under the City Human Rights Law, in the second, a federal district court ruled that New York City employers accused of sexual harassment are not entitled to an affirmative defense under which there is no employer liability where the the plaintiff unreasonably fails to utilize an existing internal complaint investigation and resolution process.
14 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.