NEXT
Case Digests

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
Holt v. County of Orange
Publication Date: 2024-01-31
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Judge: Judge Fletcher
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-55806

Supplemental jurisdiction statute does not toll federal claims that are voluntarily dismissed

Comcast of New Jersey LLC v. IBEW Local Union No. 827
Publication Date: 2024-01-31
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Ambro
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-3239

Plaintiff appealed the denial of its motion to vacate a labor arbitration award.

U.S. v. Chisholm
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Nelson S. Román
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23-CR-200

Felon-in-Possession of Ammunition Charge Violating §922(g)(1) Is Facially Constitutional

State v. Alamo
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2635-21

Defendant appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated.

Dixon v. U.S.
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Medical Malpractice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Eric Komitee
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-CV-4660

SAC Clarifying Death's Causation in Malpractice Action Is Partially Struck

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

Angrisani v. The Law Office of Leo B. Dubler, III, LLC
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-3294-21

Plaintiff appealed the dismissal of his legal malpractice action against his former attorneys.

U.S. v. Orsini
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Philip M. Halpern
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23-CR-00402

Dismissal Motion Impermissibly Sought Summary Judgment on Issue of Mens Rea

Roberts v. Farm On! Foundation, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Columbia
Judge: Justice Sara W. McGinty
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Bernard Roberts, Plaintiff/Movant: Mitchell Khosrova, Esq.
For defendant: Attorney for Farm On! Foundation, Inc., Defendant/Respondent: David B. Morgen, Esq., (Hinman Straub PC).
Case number: E012023020308

Failure to Disprove Usurious Intent Grants Plaintiff's Partial Summary Judgment

Mason v. Permanent General Assurance Corp. et al.
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Contracts | Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Chief Judge Mercier
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert Irby, (Irby Law, LLC), Vestavia, William Dobson, (Morriss, Lober & Dobson, LLC), Macon, Michael Lober, (Lober & Dobson), Woodstock, for appellant.
For defendant: Robert Norman, (Jones, Cork & Miller), Macon, Matthew Friedlander, (Webb Daniel Friedlander LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A23A1529

Court reverses dismissal of an insured party's claim for a refund or premiums in a dispute over a cancelled auto insurance policy, citing ambiguity in policy terms as a rationale for its decision

Hunte v. Fordice
Publication Date: 2024-01-30
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Kings
Judge: Justice Francois A. Rivera
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 520434/2022

Motion to Dismiss Denied; Defective Service Not Prejudicial to Defendant