Court Finds in Favor of Plaintiff in Contractual Dispute

Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to the lesser-included offense of attempted robbery.

The court, in a §1925(a) opinion, urged affirmance of its order denying Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's motion for post-trial relief following a jury verdict in favor of a SEPTA passenger who suffered a tear in his bicep muscle when the bus he was riding on as a standing passenger exhibited extraordinary movement that was not covered by the "jerk and jolt" defense urged by SEPTA.

Trial court erred as a matter of law in determining licensee's refusal of chemical testing was not knowing and conscious and in sustaining licensees' statutory appeal of his license suspension. Reversed.

While driving in Bowie County, appellant collided with a utility pole and an antique truck.

Court dismissed plaintiff's Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Defend Trade Secrets Act, conspiracy, and breach of common law duty of loyalty action against defendants and found a reasonable jury could find defendants were discriminated against based on their sex, the conduct was severe and pervasive and a reasonable person could find the workplace hostile and abusive. Motion granted in part and denied in part.

Defendant's Lack of Involvement in Asbestos Gaskets Grants Summary Judgment

Aiding in the making of false statements against the federal government was a claim belonging to the government under the False Claims Act and thus was not released by debtors' third-party release in their reorganization plan.

Standing to Assert 'Rule of Specialty' Defense Lacking; CIPA Was Followed Meticulously

Court Finds Trial Court did Not Violate Seventh Amendment by Holding Evidentiary Hearing on Tolling Statute of Limitations