Filter This View

  • C.C. v. M.H.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-11
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3900-16T1

    Plaintiffs appealed from the order granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint for grandparent visitation.

  • C.L.H. v. T.F.H.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-11
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1827-17T1

    The defendant appealed from the Family Part judge's final restraining order entered against him in favor of his estranged wife under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.

  • Stobbe v. Stobbe

    Publication Date: 2019-01-10
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1542-17T2

    Divorce proceedings began between the parties with the filing of the plaintiff's complaint and the defendant's counterclaim.

  • Morel v. Morel

    Publication Date: 2019-01-10
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1633-17T4

    Plaintiff appealed the orders denying her motion to file an amended complaint and granting defendant's motion in limine in a divorce action.

  • Frangipane v Frangipane

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2515-17T2

    Plaintiff appealed the termination of defendant's alimony obligation and the enforcement of her obligation to pay her portion of their daughter's college tuition.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Intellectual Property Licensing: Forms and Analysis

    Authors: Richard Raysman, Edward A. Pisacreta, Kenneth A. Adler, Seth H. Ostrow

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • D.J. v. T.L.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1378-17T3

    Defendant father, appealed from an order that modified the parenting time schedule for the parties' son, K.L. Defendant argued that there was no plenary hearing or finding of a substantial change of circumstances to warrant the modification.

  • Mathurin v. Mathurin

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3224-17T2

    Defendant appealed the denial of her motion to enforce a settlement she and plaintiff allegedly reached in mediation.

  • H.B. v. P.S.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4873-15T1

    Defendant appealed from two post-judgment orders.

  • In the Interest of D.R.-J.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-07
    Practice Area: Evidence | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4883-16T3

    Defendant appealed from his adjudication of delinquency for robbery, conspiracy, possession of a handgun, criminal restraint, possession of marijuana, and riot. Defendant and two acquaintances met the victims in a parking lot with the intention for them to sell defendant an Xbox.

  • M.G. v. S.M.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-07
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dale E. Console
    for defendant: Gregory S. Baxter (Caruso & Baxter, PC, attorneys; Gregory S. Baxter, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-1290-17T1

    Stock Awards Subject to Post-Divorce Vesting Contingency Not Subject to Presumption of Inclusion in Marital Estate