Filter This View

  • Colella v. Colella

    Publication Date: 2018-03-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0091-16T1

    Plaintiff appealed from the order terminating child support, setting college contribution expenses, and reducing defendant's life insurance requirement.

  • C.M.K v. S.K.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2486-16T1

    Defendant appealed from the entry of a final restraining order, based upon a finding that defendant committed the predicate act of harassment.

  • A.M.S. v. M.L.S.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2324-16T4

    Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that final restraining orders (FRO) were warranted because appellants assaulted respondent during a family argument and respondent was in need of protection from appellants' future acts or threats of violence.

  • DCPP v. S.D.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-08
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Koblitz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1905-15T4

    Appellant-mother appealed from both a finding that she educationally neglected her six-year-old daughter and an order dismissing the FN litigation, leaving the children in the custody of two grandmothers under FD orders.

  • O.R.N. v. M.D.B.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-06
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0780-16T4

    Following a lengthy dispute detailed in a prior opinion, the court reversed and remanded the trial court's order awarding a retroactive reduction in child support and counsel fees to respondent.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Ferrara on Insider Trading and The Wall

    Authors: Ralph C. Ferrara, Donna M. Nagy, Herbert Thomas

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In the Interest of N.C.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Accurso
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1713-17T1

    Defendant appealed from the trial court's order directing the public defender's office to pay for defendant's competency evaluation, which the trial court determined was necessary before the state could proceed on two juvenile complaints.

  • Kriss v. Kriss

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3255-15T3

    Husband appealed the order declaring the parties' 2004 reconciliation agreement void due to its unconscionable terms and from the final divorce judgment granting durational alimony, equitable distribution of husband's business and counsel fees.

  • David v. Wynn

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2707-16T3

    In this post-judgment matrimonial matter, appellant-wife appealed from two provisions of the Family Part's order which denied her motion to eject respondent-husband from the former marital home and her request for counsel fees and costs.

  • Friel v. Braun-Friel

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4996-15T3

    Defendant appealed from the provision of the final judgment of divorce requiring plaintiff to pay limited durational alimony of $130 per week for two years.

  • Lane v. State

    Publication Date: 2018-03-02
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 172109np_021618

    Appellant initiated a complaint against appellee regarding matters related to his parental rights.