NEXT
Case Digests

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
United States v. Perez
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Connecticut
Judge: District Judge Arterton
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3:96-CR-186

Court Denies Defendant's Motion to Extinguish Fine

Checchia v. Bank of Am., N.A.
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Surrick
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-3585

Court approved proposed class action settlement in consumer protection case where settlement was product of arms-length negotiation and would provide adequate relief to the class. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary class settlement approval and class certification granted.

Price v. Series 1 Virage Master
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-1104

A law firm, who was sued for failing to remit payments pursuant to a loan, successfully proved on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a motion for a new trial.

In Re State of Texas Ex Rel Sunshine Lubbock
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals
Judge: Judge Newell
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: WR-93,160-01

A district attorney, who sought mandamus relief from the supreme court, failed to prove to the court that the attorney followed the proper procedure on appeal.

In Re K.M.
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Judge: Judge Alvord
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: AC 45269

Court Did Not Err in Preventing Father from Therapeutic Visitation

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

Commonwealth v. Powell
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stevens
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 699 MDA 2022

Challenge to legality of sentence due to purported failure to allege element of convicted offense in criminal information constituted a cognizable claim under the PCRA, rendering petition filed 20 years after judgment of sentence patently untimely. Order of the trial court affirmed.

Twitter, Inc. v. Garland
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry: Federal Government | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Judge: Judge Bress
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-16174

Narrowly tailored restriction on public release of information regarding national security investigations does not violate First Amendment

Miller v. Christine
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 009997-CV-2019

The trial court granted plaintiff's request for equitable partition of a motor home jointly owned with defendant. The trial court ordered the vehicle's sale, with the proceeds to be equally distributed between plaintiff and defendant.

Colon v. Kinnel
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Gallagher
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 5:21-cv-03337-JMG

Motion to exclude psychologist's expert testimony denied where their opinion was based on direct examination and psychologists were trained to evaluate the reliability of the interviewee's self-assertions, and the failure to consider alternative explanations for psychological injuries merely went to the weight of the opinion testimony. Parties' cross-motions to exclude expert testimony denied.

Jezek v. Drozd
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Connecticut Superior Court, Middlesex J.D. at Middletown
Judge: Judge Swienton
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: CV-22-6033513

Court Finds Probate Court's Decision to Remove Fiduciary from Estate to be Arbitrary and Capricious