• 75 Jersey City, L.L.C. v. City of Jersey City

    Publication Date: 2024-02-22
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Brennan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 003415- 2022

    Plaintiff moved for an order enforcing litigant's rights and compelling city to comply with the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

  • Aruanno v. Internal Revenue Serv.

    Publication Date: 2024-02-21
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-2630

    Plaintiff appealed the denial of his in forma pauperis application and his requests for a guardian ad litem and transfer of venue.

  • Solvay Specialty Polymers, LLC v. Director, Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2024-02-14
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1166-22

    Plaintiffs appealed Tax Court's order and final judgment granting them a partial refund of certain sales and use taxes paid to defendant.

  • State Shorthand Reporting Serv. v. New Jersey Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev.

    Publication Date: 2024-02-12
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Marczyk
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1710-21

    Petitioners appealed the final administrative actions of the DOL, which found petitioners liable for contributions under the Unemployment Compensation Law.

  • Alemany v. Twp. of Marlboro

    Publication Date: 2024-02-12
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry: Defense | Real Estate
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Sundar
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sheryl Alemany, plaintiff pro se
    for defendant: Lani M. Lombardi (Cleary Giacobbe Alfieri Jacobs, LLC, attorneys)

    Case Number: 007209-2023

    Full-Time Service in State National Guard Constituted Qualifying Service for Veteran's Property Tax Exemption

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Pennsylvania Family Law Forms, Fourth Edition

    Authors: Joseph S. Britton

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • United States v. Hovnanian

    Publication Date: 2024-02-06
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Judge Krause
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-1338

    Defendant appealed the district court's grant of partial summary judgment to the government in its action to obtain an order of sale of defendant's property to satisfy a co-defendant's outstanding federal tax obligations.

  • Alemany v. Twp. of Marlboro

    Publication Date: 2024-01-30
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Sundar
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 007209-2023

    Plaintiff filed suit to obtain a veteran's local property tax exemption.

  • Ratan AC LLC v. City of Absecon

    Publication Date: 2024-01-22
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 000923-2023

    Defendant moved to limit plaintiff's appeal due to plaintiff's failure to comply with defendant's Chapter 91 request.

  • Scott v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2024-01-08
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doreen A. Scott, plaintiff pro se
    for defendant: Michelline Capistrano Foster, Deputy Attorney General (Matthew S. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney) Plaintiff filed a lawsuit to challenge the director’s decision to deny plaintiff the New Jersey earned income tax credit by obligating her to file a separate state income tax return under married status. Plaintiff had filed a state income tax return with a status of head of household, while her husband filed a separate return listing his status as single. However, plaintiff and her husband could only file income tax returns under a married status, either with separate returns or a joint return. The director accordingly selected a married-separate return for plaintiff, which resulted in plaintiff being denied an EITC.

    Case Number: 010435-2022

    Married Couple Were Not Statutorily Required to File a Joint Federal Income Tax Return to File a Joint State Return to Qualify for EITC

  • Scott v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2024-01-08
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doreen A. Scott, plaintiff pro se
    for defendant: Michelline Capistrano Foster, Deputy Attorney General (Matthew S. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney) Plaintiff filed a lawsuit to challenge the director’s decision to deny plaintiff the New Jersey earned income tax credit by obligating her to file a separate state income tax return under married status. Plaintiff had filed a state income tax return with a status of head of household, while her husband filed a separate return listing his status as single. However, plaintiff and her husband could only file income tax returns under a married status, either with separate returns or a joint return. The director accordingly selected a married-separate return for plaintiff, which resulted in plaintiff being denied an EITC.

    Case Number: 010435-2022

    Married Couple Were Not Statutorily Required to File a Joint Federal Income Tax Return to File a Joint State Return to Qualify for EITC