Filter This View

  • Sullivan v. Sullivan

    Publication Date: 2022-11-21
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2393-20

    Defendant appealed the denial of his motion to modify and reduce his alimony and child support obligations.

  • Livingstone v. Daniel

    Publication Date: 2022-11-21
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0790-21

    Plaintiff appealed the trial court's order awarding defendant reimbursement for college costs and other relief pursuant to the parties' MSA.

  • K.O. v. N.D.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-21
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0260-21

    Defendant appealed the trial court's order awarding temporary joint legal custody of his two daughters to plaintiffs, their maternal and paternal aunts, and establishing defendant's child support and college contribution obligations.

  • Casimir v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2022-11-16
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0403-21

    Defendant appealed the denial of his motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

  • New Jersey Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. D.C.A.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-14
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Whipple
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender (John A. Albright, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the briefs)
    for defendant: Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General (Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mary L. Harpster, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-0735-21

    Trial Courts Permitted to Consider Whether Foster/Adoptive Care Would Do More Harm than Termination of Biological Parental Bond

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate & Trust Litigation 2024

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III, Cathleen T. Butler

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Shaikh v. Germadnig

    Publication Date: 2022-11-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0191-21

    Plaintiff appealed the denial of his motion for reconsideration of order denying his application to file five civil actions.

  • A.P.C. v. S.B.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-08
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1180-21

    Defendant appealed the FRO entered against him.

  • Qualles v. Aaron

    Publication Date: 2022-11-08
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0766-21

    Mother appealed pro se the denial of her requested stay of a child support enforcement action pending her appeal of a modification motion she allegedly filed in Massachusetts.

  • Cano v. Guillen

    Publication Date: 2022-11-04
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2886-21

    Plaintiff appealed the denial of her motion for an order granting her sole legal and physical custody of her minor son and for predicate findings for Special Immigrant Juvenile status for him.

  • Farzan v. Farzan

    Publication Date: 2022-11-04
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1022-20

    Defendant appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate all orders and judgments between the parties.