Petitioner sought review of a final order affirming respondent's decision adopting an administrative law judge's adjudication that denied petitioner's request for an exception to the cap on in-home care hours he could receive from his family. The court affirmed, holding that petitioner failed to demonstrate a burden on his free exercise of religion where he could continue to receive available home care and companion services despite the fact that his mother and sister would no longer be paid for providing more than 60 hours of care pe

Summary Judgment Granted; Liability Found Against Defendant Driver

Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment against the Gloucester City Board of Education, alleging that it failed to provide a Free Appropriate Public Education to her kinship wards under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

New Jersey Superior Court Decision Not Given Full Faith and Credit in Insurance Case

The court filed a § 1925(a) opinion in support of its order granting defendant's motion to transfer the venue of this slip and fall case to Montgomery County.

Yael Silberberg, a beneficiary of the Yael Silberberg 2012 Appointed Trust, and her husband Avi Silberberg appealed orders denying their motion to change venue and dismissing Yael's complaint to remove Earl Smith as Trustee.

Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order granting appellee's motion to dismiss pursuant to the prompt trial rule under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013. The court reversed and remanded, holding that appellant did not delay appellee's prosecution on de novo appeal where it merely failed to correct its information to reflect reinstatement of a summary offense that it had voluntarily withdrawn before appellee's municipal court trial.

In the Matter of Faith NN. v. Dewey OO.

Appellant appealed the Department of Correction's response to his assertion that it was not in compliance with the Isolated Confinement Restriction Act.

Court affirms convictions for malice murder and other crimes and rejects defendant's challenge to alleged inconsistency of jury instructions and jury form, and contentions of procedural error