NEXT
Sign in to follow
Case Digests

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
Robinson v. Plawner
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-0229-22

Plaintiff appealed the judgment dismissing with prejudice her breach of contract claims against defendant dentists.

Bercy v. City of Phoenix
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Judge: Judge Johnstone
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-16463

Discrimination claim alleging hostile work environment arose before bankruptcy filing and therefore belonged to estate

Marmo & Sons Gen. Contracting LLC v. Biagi Farms LLC
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Sabatino
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Sam Maybruch (Arbus, Maybruch & Goode, LLC, attorneys; Sam Maybruch, on the briefs)
For defendant: Justin D. Santagata (Cooper Levenson, PA, attorneys; Justin D. Santagata, Samantha Edgell, and Katlin Trout, on the briefs)
Case number: A-3120-22

Litigation Conduct Including Use of Discovery Process Sufficient to Demonstrate Party's Waiver of Arbitration

San Diego Unified School District v. Superior Court (Doe D.Y.)
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Personal Injury
Industry: Education
Court: Court of Appeal, 4th District
Judge: Justice Castillo
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D083441

Ruling that plaintiff may serve and name defendant in complaint filed under C.C.P. §340.1 not determination of contested fact issues relating to merits" under C.C.P. §170.6(a)(2)

Thornell v. Jones
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Judge: Judge Alito
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-982

Ninth Circuit departed from well-established rules when it granted habeas petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

Rangel v. Rangel
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Alvarez
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 04-23-00931-CV

Appellee sought a protective order against appellant, her estranged spouse.

Duncan v. Sacor Fin., Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2583-22

Plaintiff appealed the dismissal of his Fair Debt Collection Practices Act action.

McCants v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Class Actions | Labor Law
Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Connecticut Superior Court, Hartford J.D., Complex Litigation Docket
Judge: Judge Noble
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: CV-20-6133189

Court Denies Motion for Class Certification

Sawires v. Elizabeth Bd. of Educ.
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-0071-23

Plaintiff appealed the dismissal of her complaint against the Board of Education and her complaint against the Division of Workers' Compensation.

Goyco v. Progressive Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Solomon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Christian C. LoPiano (LoPiano Law Firm, attorneys; Christian C. LoPiano, of counsel and on the briefs)
For defendant: Patricia A. Holden (Cipriani & Werner, attorneys; Patricia A. Holden and Robert A. Maren (Vella & Maren), on the briefs)
Case number: A-12-23 (088497)

Low-Speed Electric Scooter Was a "Vehicle" and Thus Riders Did Not Qualify as Pedestrians for PIP Benefits

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.