NEXT
Case Digests

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
In the Matter of Jacob G. v. Antonia H.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Unsigned Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Lynch and Fisher, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 536127

In the Matter of Jacob G. v. Antonia H.

Washabaugh v. Gaudenzia, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Olson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1363 MDA 2023

The court affirmed the order granting appellee's motion for judgment on the pleadings in a wrongful termination case on the grounds that appellant's claim was subject to a two-year statute of limitations under 42 Pa. C.S.A. §5501(7).

Orient Plus Int'l Ltd. v. Baosheng Media Group Holdings Ltd.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:24-CV-00744

Email Service on Defendants Not Barred by Hague Convention, Comports With Due Process

Yeshiva Kol Torah, Inc. v. Lakewood Twp.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 007517-2023

The parties cross-moved for summary judgment.

Frederick v. Dep't of Corr.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-1329-22

Appellant inmate appealed a final agency decision finding him guilty of three prohibited acts: *.306, conduct disrupting the facility; *.202, possession of a weapon and *.004 fighting with another person.

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Constitutional Law
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, U.S. - NDNY
Judge: District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiff, Pro Se: David C. Lettieri, Niagara County Jail, Lockport, NY.
For defendant:
Case number: 3:22-CV-1099

FBI Immune From Suit; Suit Will Be Dismissed Absent Curative Amended Complaint

K.S. v. S.H.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2038-22

Defendant appealed the grant of plaintiff's motion for counsel fees in final restraining order matter.

In the Matter of Kyung Jin Kim, an Attorney.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Unsigned Pritzker, J.P., Lynch, Ceresia, Fisher and Powers, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: PM-110-24

In the Matter of Kyung Jin Kim, an Attorney.

McKnight v. Amazon.com Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Consumer Products | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pratter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23-1449

Court dismissed product liability claims against various retailers where complaint specifically alleged the retailer from which the product was obtained. Defendants' motions to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.

Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrick
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Lazarus
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 554 MDA 2023

Commonwealth appealed from the trial court's order denying its request to present certain evidence in appellee's trial on charges that he murdered his wife. The court reversed in part, holding that the trial court erred in precluding appellant's admission of probative accident reconstruction evidence and competent expert witness evidence regarding the victim's manner of death by drowning.