0 results for 'undefined'
Orders on motions filed on:May 14, 2024
In the Matter of Jin Hee Ahn, an Attorney.
Hostile work environment claim failed where alleged comments invoking racial stereotypes did not rise to the level of being severe or pervasive, although those comments could support an inference of race discrimination. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.
In the Matter of Amin Booker v. Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant tenant appealed the court's order denying his motion to reinstate his appeal of a municipal court order denying his petition to open default judgment. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where defendant failed to timely file pleadings below, mistakenly or intentionally misrepresented filing dates to the court, and offered no meritorious legal arguments that would warrant reinstating his appeal.
View more book results for the query "*"
Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence entered on his conviction of aggravated cruelty to an animal. The court affirmed, holding that the evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of one count of animal cruelty where he intentionally shot two dogs, only one of which had made physical contact with fenced deer that the dogs were violently harassing.
Appellant appealed the trial court's orders convicting him of two summary offenses under the Game and Wildlife Code. The court reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing. The court held that appellant's charge under Game Code section 2307(a) should have been dismissed where the citation failed to set out the specifics of the alleged violation. Appellant was properly convicted under section 2504(a), however, where he shot an elk within ten feet of a roadway.
AB 173 does not violate California gun purchasers' Fourteenth Amendment right to informational privacy or Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms
Plaintiffs Kara and Paul Melone filed a complaint against Cryoport Inc.
Plaintiffs moved for remand of their action for defective design, failure to warn, negligence, public nuisance, trespass, impairment of the public trust and violations of the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act and the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250