New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Bari Weinberger | September 16, 2021
A new NJ law is a conversation opener for helping victims to better understand their rights and to finally grapple with the question of whether strangulation should ever be considered a matter of consent.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | September 12, 2021
Has the time come to give serious consideration to elimination or serious restriction of the peremptory challenge?
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Louis Locascio | September 10, 2021
COURT WATCH: Columnist and retired judge analyzes a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of New Jersey that he considers incorrect and goes beyond what was envisioned by 'Miranda v. Arizona.'
By Charles Toutant | August 18, 2021
The previous version of the report drew strong reactions from lawyers who appeared before Jones, Savage and Chesler and who did not consider them biased.
By Tom McParland | August 18, 2021
A Manhattan federal judge said the court had a "responsibility" to set bail conditions that will "prevent a danger to the community." The defendant agreed to take the shot.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Elizabeth J. Sher | August 16, 2021
The Association takes serious issue with the findings of this federal sentencing study that find fault with Senior U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler, who has earned an unimpeachable reputation for integrity, impartiality, and fairness.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Richard Coughlin | August 16, 2021
The suggestion that U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler sentences in a racially discriminatory way is irresponsible and reprehensible. It is also just wrong.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | August 15, 2021
Requiring that there be some empirical basis for the assertion that an area is afflicted with high crime rates would be a first step in determining whether use of the concept in Fourth Amendment doctrine is justified by its actual efficacy.
By Suzette Parmley | August 3, 2021
The court said the New Jersey Constitution "is designed to protect individual rights, and it provides greater protection against unreasonable searches and seizures than the Fourth Amendment."
By Charles Toutant | July 21, 2021
"None of my clients has been scheduled to go to court. They haven't been given a date to appear. These people call my office and they want a status report and we have a duty to tell them, but there is no progress," Matthew Reisig, a Freehold attorney, said.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...