Drawing Bright Lines for the Role of the Jury
In the 2002-2003 term, the Supreme Court decided a wide span of issues, including juror disqualification; searches and seizures; DNA procurement applications; conflicts of interest on the part of both prosecutors and defense attorneys; child endangering; the admission of personality disorder evidence, of excited utterances and of prior wrongs; child pornography; self representation; the wearing of prison garb and restraints by testifying witnesses; jury instructions; sentencing; and others.Otherwise Placid Term Is Rocked by Decision Upending Law on Remittitur
In He v. Miller , the bedrock principles that strictly limited judges substituting their judgment for the jury were shaken to their core.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250