Filter This View

  • Nexon Am. Inc. v. Uniloc 2017 LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-07-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Phillip Rovner and Jonathan Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Allen Wang, David Hayes, Earl Mah, Charlene Morrow, Min Wu and Venessa Park-Thompson, Fenwick & West LLP, San Francisco, CA, Mountain View, CA and New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Brian Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; James Etheridge, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX for defendants.
    Case Number: D69034

    The court had subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's declaratory judgment claims involving certain patents, but not for other patents that had been invalidated by another federal court.

  • f'real Foods, LLC v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-07-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Food and Beverage
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rodger D. Smith II, Michael J. Flynn and Taylor Haga, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Guy W. Chambers and Peter Colosi, Sideman & Bancroft LLP, San Francisco for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Francis DiGiovanni, Thatcher A. Rahmeier, William S. Foster, Jr., Kenneth M. Vorrasi and Brianna L. Silverstein, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE and Washington, DC for defendants.
    Case Number: D69037

    Plaintiffs failed to establish rental lost profits.

  • Gavrieli Brands LLC v. Soto Massini (USA) Corp.

    Publication Date: 2020-04-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Consumer Products
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David W. Marston, Jr. and Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Lyons and Ehsun Forghany, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Sharon R. Smith and Brett A. Lovejoy, Ph.D., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Stamatios Stamoulis, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stephen M. Lobbin and Austin J. Richardson, SML Avvocati P.C., San Diego, CA for defendants.
    Case Number: D68935

    Judgment as a matter of law or new trial on infringement claims denied where plaintiff presented expert testimony and real-world evidence showing that consumers were confused by defendant's allegedly infringing products.

  • Baggage Airline Guest Servs., Inc. v. Roadie, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-03-25
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Travel and Tourism
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Neal C. Belgam and Eve H. Ormerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan v. Stein and Cole Carson, GrayRobinson, P.A. Tampa, FL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward A. Pennington, John P. Moy, John P. Pennington, and Darlene K. Tzou, Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
    Case Number: D68918

    Motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to the "exceptional case" standard for patent infringement cases denied where plaintiff's patent, although directed to a non-inventive concept, was not indicative of an exceptionally meritless claim, and where plaintiff's litigation conduct was not conclusively indicative of vexatious litigation conduct.

  • Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-03-25
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver and Alexandra M. Joyce McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE
    for defendant: Daralyn J. Durie, Adam R. Brausa, Eric C. Wiener and Enenda Hoxha, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA for Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. Paul B. Gaffney, David I. Berl, Thomas S. Fletcher, Kyle E. Thomason, Teagan J. Gregory, Charles L. McCloud and Kathryn S. Kayali, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; William F. Lee, Lisa J. Pirozzolo, Emily R. Whelan, Kevin S. Prussia, Andrew J. Danford, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA; Robert J. Gunther Jr., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY; and Nora Passmaneck of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Denver, CO for Genentech, Inc. Melanie K. Sharp and James L. Higgins, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neal C. Belgam, Eve H. Ormerod and Jennifer M. Rutter, Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for Amgen Inc.
    Case Number: D68923

    The court relied on extrinsic evidence to construe a term relating to a fermentation process in this pharmaceutical patent case.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Florida Construction Defect Litigation 2022

    Authors: Gary L. Brown

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Galderma Lab., L.P. v. Medinter US LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-03-25
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph A. Mahoney, Mayer Brown LLP, Charlotte, NC; B. Clayton McCraw and Ying-Zi Yang, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Melanie K. Sharp, James L. Higgins and Michelle M. Ovanesian, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven Lieberman, Rachel M. Echols, Daniel R. McCallum and Nicole M. DeAbrantes, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington, DC for defendant.
    Case Number: D68922

    The court dismissed plaintiff's claim for direct patent infringement, but it denied the motion to dismiss as to the claim for indi-rect infringement.

  • Personal Audio, LLC v. Google, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-22
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian Farnan and Michael Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Douglas Hahn and Salil Bali, Stradling Yoc-ca Carlson & Rauth, P.C., Newport Beach, CA; Henning Schmidt, Minghui Yang, R. Floyd Walker, Victor Hardy and William Parrish, Hardy, Parish, Yang, LLP, Austin, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Brian Egan and Jack Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Antonia Sistos, Da-vid Perlson and Melissa Baily, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant.
    Case Number: D68850

    The court issued its claim construction order after hearing the parties' objections to the recommenda-tions of a magistrate judge.

  • Sprint Commc'ns Co. L.P. v. Frontier Commc'ns Corp.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-15
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Fallon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68844

    Plaintiff's motion to amend to name additional parties stated sufficient facts to support the existence of an agency relation-ship and joint infringement.

  • Sprint Commc'ns Co. LP v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Montgomery Donaldson and Christina B. Vavala, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; B. Trent Webb, Aaron E. Hankel, Ryan J. Schletzbaum, Ryan D. Dykal, Jordan T. Bergsten, Lauren E. Douville, Mark D. Schafer, Maxwell C. McGraw, Samuel J. LaRoque, Robert H. Reckers and Michael W. Gray, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO and Houston, TX for Sprint Communications.
    for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David S. Benyacar, Daniel L. Reisner and Robert J. Ka-terberg, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY and Washington, DC; Gregory Arovas, Jeanne M. Heffernan, James E. Marina, Luke L. Dauchot and Bao Nguyen, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA for Charter Communications. Steven J. Balick and Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Robinson Vu, Lindsay Volpenhein Cutié, Amy E. Bergeron and Timothy S. Durst, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX and Dallas, TX for Media-com Communications, WideOpenWest Networks, Atlantic Broadband Fin. and Grande Communications Networks. Phillip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa and Alan R. Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian M. Buroker, Omar F. Amin, Jessica Altman and Robert Vincent, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC and Dallas, TX for Frontier Com-munications.
    Case Number: D68836

    The court construed patent terms relating to technology for making telephone calls over the internet.

  • British Telecomm. plc v. Fortinet Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter, Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; James H. Shalek, Baldassare Vinti, Nolan M. Goldber, and Fabio E. Tarud, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Brian P. Egan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Neukom and James Y. Pak, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Palo Alto, CA for defendant.
    Case Number: D68831

    Motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds pursuant to an exclusive forum selection agreement denied where it was not clear that plaintiffs would be able to assert their U.S. patent infringement claims in the required foreign court.