Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
191 results for '* topic:"Contractual Disputes"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-01-02
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Accounting | Consulting | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian C. Ralston and Jacob R. Kirkham of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: David A. Dorey and Adam V. Orlacchio of Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68410
Plaintiff failed to state a claim for breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing where the contract specifically addressed the matter at issue, and defendant did not act unreasonably in requiring plaintiff to give notice prior to entering defendant's facility.
Publication Date: 2018-12-26
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Consulting | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Harris and Sean A. Meluney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Richard P. Rollo and Kevin M. Gallagher, Richards, Layton & Finger P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68403
The parties' settlement agreement was ambiguous, and extrinsic evidence indicated that the scope of the release provision did not extend to a foreign divorce proceeding.
Publication Date: 2018-12-19
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Deals and Transactions
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth S. Fenton and Scott W. Perkins, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip Trainer, Jr. and Marie M. Degnan, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Mark D. Cahill, Phoebe Fischer-Groban and Christina G.T. Lau, Choate Hall & Steward LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.
Case Number: D68397
Plaintiff did not establish that defendant breached the parties' sale agreement by failing to disclose non-renewals by some of its major customers, because the agreement did not require such notice.
Publication Date: 2018-12-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric Lopez Schnabel and Alessandra Glorioso, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Wilmington, DE; Thomas P. Swigert and Phil Steger of Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN for plaintiff.
for defendant: Elena C. Norman and Benjamin M. Potts, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Judson E. Lobdell of Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D68386
Plaintiff adequately stated a claim for breach of the parties' engagement letter involving financial services, but discovery was necessary to determine factual issues.
Publication Date: 2018-12-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tammy L. Mercer and M. Paige Valeski, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mat-thew L. Larrabee and Benjamin M. Rose, Dechert LLP, New York, NY; Michael S. Doluisio, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Susan M. Hannigan and Sarah T. Andrade, Richards, Layton & Finger P.A., Wil-mington, DE; David B. Tulchin, Brian T. Frawley and Andrew J. Finn, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D68385
Res judicata and collateral estoppel did not bar a plaintiff's claims for a subsequent breach of contract, but plaintiff failed to demonstrate it was entitled to a preliminary injunction.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: T. BART GARY, JAKE CARROLL
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-11-28
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jessica Zeldin of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott G. Burdine and David E. Wayne of Burdine Wynne LLP, Houston, TX for plaintiffs
for defendant: Timothy R. Dudderar and Travis R. Dunkelberger of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP for Blue Bell de-fendants; Srinivas M. Raju and Kelly L. Freund of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendants Bridges and Kruse.
Case Number: D68371
Plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts to rebut the presumption of corporate separateness between a parent company and its subsidiary, and their conclusory allegations did not support theories for piercing the corporate veil or joint venture liability.
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities
Industry: Consulting | Defense | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Oderah C. Nwaeze and Ryan E. Borneman of Duane Morris LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip Trainer, Jr. and Hayley Lenahan of Ashby & Geddess, Wilmington, DE; Kenneth J. Pfaehler of Dentons US LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: D68363
Defendant adequately alleged its breach of contract counterclaims, but it failed to state a viable claim for fraud and matters relating to alter ego liability had to be filed in another court.
Publication Date: 2018-10-10
Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Contractual Disputes
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Shannon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68317
A creditor's extension of the time for curing defaults under a franchise agreement did not contain a clear and unambiguous notice of termination.
Publication Date: 2018-09-19
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Automotive
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68292
The court granted a motion for a temporary restraining order granted, in part, but held the motion for a pre-liminary injunction in abeyance.
Publication Date: 2018-09-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry:
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: S. Mark Hurd, Alexandra M. Cumings, Danny David, Benjamin Sweet and Kelly Hanen for plaintiff
for defendant: A. Thompson Bayliss, Cameron T. Kirby, Matthew L. DiRisio and Thomas G. Weber for defendant.
Case Number: D68283
A party properly exercised its rights under a put agreement, so the company was contractually obligated to pay the put price.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read