Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
393 results for '* topic:"Mergers and Acquisitions"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2017-12-20
Practice Area: Contracts | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth J. Nachbar, Zi-Xiang Shen, Sandra C. Goldstein, Antony L. Ryan and Kevin J. Orsini for plaintiff
for defendant: Rolin P. Bissell, Tammy L. Mercer, James M. Yoch, Jr., Michael C. Holmes, John C. Wander, Michael L. Charlson and Craig E. Zieminski for defendants.
Case Number: D67980
A company which terminated a merger based on the failure of a condition precedent was not entitled to recover a termination fee under the terms of the parties merger agreement.
Publication Date: 2017-12-13
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen C. Norman, Matthew F. Davis, Matthew R. Dreyfuss, Robert J. Brookhiser and Elizabeth B. McCallum for plaintiff
for defendant: Gregory P. Williams, Rudolf Koch, Robert L. Burns, Matthew D. Perri, Peter J. Biersteker and C. Kevin Marshall for defend-ants.
Case Number: D67969
The court relied on the plain language and grammatical construction of the terms of a sale agreement to resolve the parties dispute regarding the buyers obligation to use reasonable best efforts.
Publication Date: 2017-12-13
Practice Area: Contracts | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey Moyer, Richard P. Rollo, Travis S. Hunter, Robert M. Hoffman, Michael J. Chiusano and James C. Bookhout for plain-tiff
for defendant: Kenneth J. Nachbar, John P. DiTomo, Barnaby Grzaslewicz, Robin L. Cohen and Natasha Romagnoli for defendants.
Case Number: D67972
Plaintiffs in business sale transaction alleged sufficient facts regarding omissions, concealment and fraudulent representations to state a claim for fraud in the inducement.
Publication Date: 2017-12-13
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stuart A. Davidson and Christopher Martins, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Boca Raton, FL; David T. Wissbroecker and Edward Gergosian, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, attorneys for plaintiff
for defendant: Thomas A. Beck, Blake Rohrbacher, and Susan M. Hannigan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D67968
Although proxy failed to disclose identity of selling companys key negotiators, stockholders challenge to tender offer and merger transaction dismissed for failure to plead non-exculpated claims against co-founders and directors, where there was no evidence that majority of board and tendering stockholders were interested or non-independent.
Publication Date: 2017-11-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Sleet
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67950
Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend complaint to add new defendant and new claim against that defendant denied, where related existing claims had already been dismissed in favor of arbitration, new claim could have been asserted in separate action, and proceedings would be delayed as discovery had partially completed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jayme C. Long
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2017-11-15
Practice Area: Contracts | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Construction
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth J. Nachbar, Lauren Neal Bennett, Ira Lee Sorkin and Amit Sondhi for plaintiffs
for defendant: Brian C. Ralston, Aaron R. Sims, Kwesi Atta-Krah, Nomi L. Castle and Matthew J. Luce for defendant.
Case Number: D67937
The unambiguous terms of a merger agreement required the payment of earn-out consideration after pre-tax profit reports became binding.
Publication Date: 2017-11-08
Practice Area: Class Actions | Corporate Governance | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis J. Murphy, Jr., Jonathan L. Parshall, Laurence D. Paskowitz, Deborah R. Gross and Roy Jacobs for plaintiffs
for defendant: John C. Cordrey, George T. Conway III, Bradley R. Wilson and Jordan L. Pietzsch for M&T Bank de-fendants; Kevin R. Shannon, Tracy Richelle High and Christen M. Martosella for Hudson Bank de-fendants.
Case Number: D67929
Plaintiffs in a class action suit failed to demonstrate that a proxy statement issued in connection with a merger transaction was misleading. Motion to dismiss granted, without prejudice.
Publication Date: 2017-08-30
Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: Delaware Court of Chancery
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67851
Shareholders failed to state a claim that the board of directors breached their fiduciary duty with regard to a merger, because the board held at least six meetings and received several valuations r
Publication Date: 2017-08-30
Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: Delaware Court of Chancery
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67851
Shareholders failed to state a claim that the board of directors breached their fiduciary duty with regard to a merger, because the board held at least six meetings and received several valuations r
Publication Date: 2017-08-23
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Biotechnology | Consulting | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Court of Chancery
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67838
Defendant not required to pay contingent merger consideration where contingency requiring drug efficacy study failed to meet both required re
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read