Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Hall
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Walter R. Davis III and Diana M. Coke-Davis, Dover, DE, pro se plaintiffs.
for defendant: Scott B. Czerwonka, Anna Lucia Fiscella, Wilks Law LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 21-1713 (JLH)
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act claims failed where borrowers' communications did not constitute "qualified written requests" as defined by the act and the servicer's responses did not injure the borrowers.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Health Care Law
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Federal Government | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dylan J. Steinberg, United States Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Adam E. Lyons, Amanda N. Liskamm, Joshua Fowkes, Kathleen B. Gilchrist, Katherine M. Ho, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Robert W. Whetzel, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Laura Jane Durfee, Jones Day, Columbus, OH; Yaakob M. Roth, Kristen A. Lejnieks, William G. Laxton, Jr., Jones Day, Washington, DC; Andrew J. Junker, Jason S. Varnado, Jones Day, Houston, TX; Karen P. Hewitt, Jones Day, San Diego, CA; David W. Ogden, Charles C. Speth, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: 20-1744-CFC
Pharmacy operator did not commit unlawful violations of the Controlled Substances Act where reporting of suspicious drug orders was not yet required by the act and where the allegedly violated regulations promulgated under the CSA were inconsistent with the act's express prohibitions.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Ambro
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John Bash, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Austin, TX; Daniel C. Posner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Eric W. Pinker, Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, LLP, Dallas, TX; Ricardo Palacio, Ashby & Geddes, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: Nicole A. Saharsky, Minh Nguyen-Dang, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC; Michael P. Lennon, Charles S. Kelley, Jr., Susan L. Alkadri, Mayer Brown LLP, Houston, TX; Bryan J. Hall, Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey M. Scott, Archer & Greiner, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for appellee.
Case Number: 22-3019
Original tenant could not be held liable under assigned lease which was amended by the landlord and assignee without the original tenant's knowledge or consent.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Retail
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Emily Laursen Raisis, Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O’Neill, P.A., Christiana, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Maria Paris Newill, Heckler & Frabizzio, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: N23A-03-006 MMJ
Industrial Accident Board did not err in denying claimant's motion to strike portions of employer's expert's testimony based on newly obtained medical records where claimant knew about her prior medical records and thus employer was not at fault for the fact that claimant's expert did not possess those records to offer testimony.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Hughes
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tracy L. Pearson, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Wilmington, DE; Joseph Diamante, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, New York, NY; Raymond Jones, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA; William Flachsbart, Mark Magas, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jason James Rawnsley, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; David S. Almeling, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA; Timothy S. Durst, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 1:22-cv-01341-TMH
Court declined to dismiss trade secret claims where the parties' contracts could be reasonably interpreted to impose a duty of confidentiality upon defendant to protect plaintiff's disclosed proprietary technology.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: By Alex Geisler
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam Hiller, Hiller Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE
for defendant: Patrick Costello, Vectis Law, Redwood City, CA for assignee.
Case Number: 2023-1294-PAF
Court denied assignee's motion to appoint appraisers and fix a bond where assignee failed to file a timely inventory and obtained appraisers without court approval.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle, Millsboro, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Emily A. Letcher, Patricia L. Enerio, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: 22-1612-RGA
Court dismissed civil rights complaint arising from a New Jersey traffic stop involving a New Jersey resident, finding that it lacked personal jurisdiction.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Placide Umuhoza, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Jennifer C. Bebko Jauffert, Puja Upadhyay, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. for defendants.
Case Number: 23-552 (MN)
Court dismissed employment discrimination action for lack of sufficient allegations supporting an inference of national origin discrimination.
Publication Date: 2024-03-18
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Restrepo
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1297
Seller did not breach implied covenant of good faith in negotiations simply by increasing its asking price, as non-binding letter of intent allowed parties to terminate negotiations except to breach exclusivity provision.
Publication Date: 2024-03-18
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Health Care
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher J. Day, Day Law Group, LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Michael J. Maiomone, Gabriella Mouriz, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: 2022-0728-SG
Chancery court lacked jurisdiction over complaint seeking specific performance where the relief sought by plaintiff was legal in nature and the parties' contract could not confer jurisdiction.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read