• InterMune, Inc. v. Harkonen

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Biotechnology | Insurance | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen A. Jacobs, Megan W. Cascio, Courtney Kurz, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Laurie Carr Mims, Benjamin D. Rothstein, Candice Mai Khanh Nguyen, Melissa Cornell, Catherine C. Porto, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Michael A. Weidinger, Megan Ix Brison, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce LLC, Wilmington, DE; Elizabeth Sandza, Richard Sandza, Sandza Law, PLLC, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: 2021-0694-NAC

    Officer was obligated to reimburse corporation for advancement costs issued in connection with officer's criminal prosecution for actions taken in the course of his duties when that prosecution culminated in his conviction, precluding him from asserting good faith entitlement to indemnification under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

  • MSCM Holdings, Inc. v. PCS-Mosaic Holdings, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Defense | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Alan D. Albert, Stephen D. Dargitz, O’Hagan Meyer PLLC, Wilmington, DE; Charles M. Sims, C. Quinn Adams, O’Hagan Meyer, PLLC, Richmond, VA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John G. Harris, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: 2022-0959-SG

    Court dismissed third-party claims as unable to provide relief if defendants were found liable to plaintiffs, and defendants' counterclaims for their failure to provide the contractually required pre-suit notice.

  • Fortis Advisors LLC v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing | Software
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Chancellor Adams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald S. Gellert, Gellert Seitz Busenkell & Brown, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Derek J. Meyer, Prospect Law LLP, Los Angelos, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jacqueline A. Rogers, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Victor L. Hou, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY; Nowell D. Bamberger, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: 2023-1055-MAA

    Court declined to find a breach of merger agreement where seller agreed to impose no specific contractual duties upon the buyer to achieve the milestone for a contingent payment, as the buyer had discretion to exercise business judgment provided its primary purpose was not to defeat the milestone payment.

  • Former SARcode Shareholder LLC v. Novartis Pharma AG

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Harris, Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Stephen C. Norman, Jaclyn C. Levy, Emma K. Diver, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: 2022-1053-NAC

    Court denied motion to vacate judgment dismissing action to enforce information rights on res judicata grounds where existence of underlying clinical trial data had been known to parties in prior action, where they could have sued to enforce their information rights.

  • In the Matter of the Niki & Darren Irrevocable Trust

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2019-0302-SG

    Successor beneficiary of trust successfully challenged purported decanting of trust corpus into a new trust where the trust did not give trustees the authority to invade trust corpus, a necessary power to decant trust assets under Delaware law.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024

    Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In re Kraft Heinz Demand Refused Derivative Stockholder Litig.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch & Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; P. Bradford deLeeuw, deLeeuw Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin Kaufman & Patrick Donovan, Wolf Haldenstein Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Michael Hynes, Ligaya Hernandez, Hynes & Hernandez LLC, Malvern, PA; Robert C. Schubert, Willem F. Jonckheer, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, San Francisco, CA; Richard D. Greenfield, Marguerite R. Goodman, Ann M. Caldweel, Greenfield & Goodman LLC, Philadelphia, PA; Fred T. Isquith, Sr., Isquith Law PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Matthew D. Stachel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel J. Kramer, Andrew J. Ehrlich, William A. Clareman, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY; Michael A. Pittenger, Jacqueline A. Rogers, Caneel Radinson-Blasucci, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sandra C. Goldstein, Stefan Atkinson, Kevin M. Neylan, Jr., Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY for defendants.

    Case Number: 2022-0398-LWW

    Court dismissed derivative complaint following rejected litigation demand where plaintiff stockholders had alleged no facts demonstrating errors or improprieties in the efforts of the working group formed to investigate plaintiffs' litigation demands.

  • 330 Hospitality Group, LLC v. The City of Rehoboth Beach

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
    Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Robinson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard E. Berl, Jr., Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, LLC, Lewes, DE for petitioner.
    for defendant: Daniel A. Griffith, Thomas Wallace, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLC, Wilmington, DE for respondents.

    Case Number: S22C-11-016 RHR

    Court remanded denial of rezoning application where city commissioners failed to adequately explain the legal reasons for denying the application.

  • Exit Strategy, LLC v. Festival Retail Fund BH, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate | Retail
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David A. Jenkins, Jason Z. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Douglas D. Herrmann, James H.S. Levine, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew W. Zepeda, Lurie, Zepeda, Schmalz, Hogan & Martin, Los Angeles, CA for appellee.

    Case Number: 318, 2023

    Special limited partner was not entitled to distribution from sale of partnership's primary asset where partnership was entitled to deduct defeasance costs to satisfy the mortgage to sell the property as a "loan interest cost."

  • Cook v. Deep Hole Creek Assoc.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard E. Berl, Jr., Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, LLC, Lewes, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John W. Paradee, Brian V. DeMott, Baird Mandalas Brockstedt & Federico, LLC, Dover, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: 2021-0522-SG

    Where the deed and survey record supported finding that the original property owners intended for a subdivided lot to extend to the centerline of the adjacent waterway to ensure the lot had sufficient acreage to become buildable, the court quieted title in favor of the lot's current owners' right to wharf out from their property.

  • Seavitt v. N-able, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas Curry, Saxena White, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David Wales, Saxena White, P.A., White Plains, NY; Adam Warden, Saxena White, P.A., Boca Raton, FL; Julie Goldsmith Reiser, Richard A. Speirs, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Matthew D. Perri, Nicole M. Henry, Kevin M. Kidwell, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: 2023-0326-JTL

    Governance provisions transferring authority from board to controlling investors was facially invalid where such provisions had not been incorporated into the corporate charter, as charters could not incorporate private agreements by reference without rendering them non-public and preventing stockholders from amending the charter.