Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Michael Marciano | April 27, 2018
Thomas D. Colin has rejoined the Greenwich law firm he co-founded after retiring as a Superior Court judge.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Stephen P. Haller and Jennie L. Osborne | April 23, 2018
April 25 is Parental Alienation Awareness Day
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By E. Leo Milonas and Andrew C. Smith | April 19, 2018
In their Appellate Division Review column, E. Leo Milonas and Andrew C. Smith highlight some of the Appellate Division's closely watched cases—including a number of reversals—from the first quarter of 2018.
By Michael Booth | April 13, 2018
The Senate on Thursday approved the bill in a 30-5 vote. It still has to go through the Assembly and be signed by Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy if it is to become law.
By David Gialanella | April 13, 2018
Twice-vetoed legislation that would sanction the type of surrogacy-for-hire contracts famously deemed unenforceable three decades ago in the state Supreme Court's In re Baby M case has now passed the Legislature.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Yonaton Levoritz | April 9, 2018
While the Judicial Departments of the New York Appellate Division and the State Court of Appeals are in tandem in their holdings concerning the manner in which lower courts are to handle split custody arrangements and child support, New York practitioners are reporting that lower courts recently have been misapplying the law.
Connecticut Law Tribune | Letter to the Editor
By Joette Katz | April 9, 2018
It is a fundamental principle that the judicial component of government is independent in order to insulate its members from punitive actions by the legislative and executive branches of the government.
By Michael Booth | April 6, 2018
If enacted, New Jersey would be the only state in the nation that would bar those under 18 from marrying. And judicial approval for underage marriages would no longer be allowed, unlike the present system.
By Tony Mauro | April 6, 2018
Douglas Hallward-Driemeier says the Arkansas ruling on lawyer fees was “exceptionally frustrating, because there was no question that we were the prevailing party.”
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By David Laniado | April 5, 2018
Though Family Court proceedings are deemed civil, fairness, justice and due process cry out for respondents to be granted credit for the time they are “temporarily” subjected to an order of protection pending a final determination. It is time that the Family Courts follow suit and grant such credit to respondents, especially when a temporary order of protection is issued and the hearing is protracted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
The County Counsel's Office is recruiting for a Litigation Attorney. These positions provide legal advice, assistance and representation in ...
Harter Secrest & Emery LLP is seeking a mid- to senior-level Employee Benefits attorney for the firm s Rochester, Buffalo or Albany offi...
***Location is in Edison, New Jersey*** We are a busy Central New Jersey Defense Firm specializing in Workers Compensation Law. We service...