By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 18, 2017
Incapacitated Juvenile Placed with Office Of Mental Health for Treatment
By therecorder | The Recorder | September 18, 2017
C.A. 4th; D072056 The Fourth Appellate District reversed a dependency court order. The court held that dependency court erred in directing the county…
By Louis Locascio | September 18, 2017
New standard in relocation cases: What's good for the custodial parent is not necessarily what's good for child.
By Michael Booth | September 18, 2017
Custodial parents looking to move out of New Jersey have a difficult hill to climb if their ex-spouses object to the move, even if the move involves a better job or a new spouse. That is the general consensus among New Jersey family lawyers in the wake of a landmark ruling last month by the state Supreme Court that changed the landscape for child relocation.
By therecorder | The Recorder | September 14, 2017
C.A. 1st; A144936 The First Appellate District affirmed dependency court orders. The court held that a father who inflicted devastating and irreparable…
By therecorder | The Recorder | September 13, 2017
C.A. 2nd; B278951 The Second Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that an action to establish a paternal relationship may be brought…
By P.J. D'Annunzio | September 12, 2017
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Max Baer has announced the selection of seven counties to participate in a program designed to support abused and neglected children.
By therecorder | The Recorder | September 12, 2017
C.A. 2nd; B279742 The Second Appellate District affirmed a dependency court order. The court held that the dependency court did not abuse its discretion…
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 12, 2017
Trial court properly found that the current placement goal of reunification was not appropriate or feasible, ordered agency to file a petition for termination of parental rights and substantially reduced mother's visitation because mother had been incarcerated for endangering the welfare of an older child. Affirmed.
By Kathleen Creamer and John Pollock | September 11, 2017
As attorneys who represented amici in the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court case In re L.B.M., we write to respond to the June 26, public interest column describing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in that case, ("Providing a Voice for the Child in Court"). With respect for our colleagues at the Support Center for Child Advocates, we believe that this column understates both the breadth and the clarity of the court's holding in that case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
parkingticket.com is the world-leader in local, municipal compliance. Whether it be a food delivery, or a fine bottle of wine being delive...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...