• Estanislao Enter., Inc. v. FedEx Ground Corp.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Cargo and Shipping
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Fischer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-1809

    Court granted motion to compel arbitration where plaintiff failed to challenge delegation clause or allege fraud in the procurement of the parties' contract, or show that it qualified for the transportation worker exception. Defendant's motion to compel arbitration granted.

  • In re: C.A.J.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Panella
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 942 EDA 2023

    Incapacitated mother's daughter appealed the county orphans' court's decree finding mother incapacitated and appointing daughter's siblings as guardians of mother's person. The court affirmed, concluding the orphans' court acted within its discretion in light of evidence of mother's preference and the personal care provided to mother by daughter's siblings.

  • Franko v. United Servs Auto. Ass'n

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Insurance
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Judge: Judge Nealon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2023 CV 1996

    Defendant auto insurer filed preliminary objections contesting subject matter jurisdiction and other matters in plaintiff insured's action for breach of contract and bad faith. The court overruled defendant's preliminary objections except as to venue, on which it ordered discovery and further briefing.

  • Mut. Benefit Ins. Co. v. Koser

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Insurance | Real Estate
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Bender
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1340 MDA 2022

    Tenants qualified as co-insureds immune from subrogation claim where they had a reasonable expectation that landlord would obtain fire insurance for the leased premises and would look to that insurance for compensation for fire loss as lease made landlord responsible for insuring his interests. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.

  • Delaware Valley Landscape Stone, Inc. v. RRQ, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2103 EDA 2021

    Appellant family trust appealed the trial court's judgment in favor of appellee in appellee's quiet title action. The court reversed, struck the trial court's judgment, and remanded for further proceedings. The court held that appellant was not required to take immediate interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of its petition to strike or open a default judgment, rendering its notice of appeal timely filed after the trial court's entry of a final judgment in favor of appellee. The court held further that appellee's quiet ti

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Legal Malpractice & Lawyer Discipline 2024

    Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • PC Land LLC v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Bethlehem Twp.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
    Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge McCullough
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21 C.D. 2023

    Court affirmed trial court's decision striking down condition of issuance of building permits and granting mandamus relief where statutory regulations did not require issuance of highway occupancy permit as condition for building permits and applicant's right to the permits was facially clear. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.

  • United States v. Hopkins

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Smith
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-1836

    The court reversed the order of the district court dismissing a count of appellee's indictment for an implied "ruse exception" to the Speedy Trial Act, finding that the STA contains no implied ruse exception at least for a prosecution first initiated in state court.

  • Jones v. Erie Ins. Exch.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Insurance | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Murray
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 690 WDA 2020

    New precedent upholding the validity of "regular use" exclusion in underinsured motorist policies supported trial court's judgment for insurer following accident where insured was injured while operating a regularly-used, employer-owned work vehicle. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.

  • Caimano v. H&R Block

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Slomsky
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-3272

    Defendants moved to compel arbitration and stay litigation pursuant to a contractual arbitration clause. The court granted the motion, holding that plaintiffs' claims alleging unlawful disclosure of confidential tax return information were subject to contractual arbitration under the binding and enforceable arbitration provision contained in defendants' online services agreement.

  • United States v. Savage

    Publication Date: 2024-07-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Beetlestone
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-454

    The court denied defendants' motion to suppress evidence including cell phone tower records obtained in the vicinity of their heist of a shipment of over $230,000 worth of newly minted dimes.