• Werner v. 1281 King Assoc., LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Food and Beverage
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1725 MDA 2023

    The court affirmed the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County that sustained appellees' preliminary objection that determined that Mr. Werner had released appellees from liability in this tort case in an agreement that terminated the parties' business relationship.

  • Cichon v. Pingitore-Harze

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Discovery
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Higgins
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 5676 CV 2020

    Plaintiff moved for imposition of discovery sanctions for defendants' failure to comply with court-ordered discovery. The court scheduled a hearing on potential sanctions, concluding that defendants' past, intentional failure to provide discovery responses was obdurate, vexatious and contemptuous in nature.

  • Hamill v. Twin Cedars Senior Living, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Wrongful Death
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
    Judge: District Judge Carlson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3:20-CV-231

    Court granted sanctions motions due to plaintiff's unexcused failure to comply with discovery obligations, which prejudiced defendants' case preparation, and plaintiff's counsel's continued pursuit of discredited legal theories without conducting further investigation or submitting supporting evidence. Defendants' motions for sanctions granted in part.

  • Tucci v. Gilead Sci., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Ranjan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2:21-CV-1859-NR

    The court granted summary judgment to employer on employee's claim under the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law, but denied summary judgment on the common law wrongful discharge claim which may proceed to a jury trial.

  • Chijoke-Uche v. Cobblestone Estates Cmty. Ass'n, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
    Judge: Judge McMaster
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2024-00562

    In this § 1925(a) opinion, the trial court recommended that appellant's pro se appeal of the court's order sustaining appellee's preliminary objections to the complaint and dismissing the complaint without prejudice be either quashed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to comply with Pa. R.A.P. 1925 or alternatively affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Florida Construction Defect Litigation 2025

    Authors: Gary L. Brown

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. Muldrow

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Kunselman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1622 MDA 2023

    Appellant appealed after he was sentenced for violating parole. The court quashed the appeal, holding that it was untimely filed where the Friday after Thanksgiving was not a legal holiday for which filing deadlines were extended to the following Monday.

  • Commonwealth v. Mucci

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 138 WDA 2024

    Appellant appealed the trial court's order denying his motion to vacate his sexually violent predator designation and lifetime registration requirements initially imposed under Megan's Law III. The court affirmed, holding that a SVP designated as such under the former Megan's Law III was lawfully subject to lifetime registration requirements under the subsequently-enacted Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act.

  • United States v. Jackson

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Krause
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-1707

    The court affirmed the district court's denial of appellants' motion to suppress evidence obtained after an investigative traffic stop. The safety measures taken by police to ensure the suspects did not possess dangerous weapons and jeopardize their safety were reasonable.

  • Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Rivers

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Williamson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 001402-CV-2020

    Plaintiff mortgage holder filed an ejectment action against defendant property owner. Upon trial, the court granted plaintiff's request for ejectment in part and denied it in part, holding that plaintiff had no right of ejectment to two of the three lots under the foreclosure action as filed where plaintiff failed to prove its ownership of those lots.

  • Commonwealth v. Blango

    Publication Date: 2024-11-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Panella
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1621 MDA 2023

    Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence imposed after revocation of appellant's probation. The court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in revoking appellant's probation and imposing a term of incarceration where appellant initiated contact with a family member in violation of known conditions of supervision that were properly imposed by the probation department in light of appellant's original conditions of probation.