Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
555 results for '* topic:"Family Law"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-11-04
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1307
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that it was in child's best interest for appellant to be liable for child support based on the doctrine of paternity by estoppel because appellant had a long-term in loco parentis relationship with child that began when child was an infant, he held himself out as the child's father for years, formed a close emotional bond with her and listed her as a dependent on his tax returns. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-10-28
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Strassburger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1262
The trial court did not err in applying 23 Pa.C.S. §3501(c) of the divorce code to award wife a portion of husband's municipal employee retirement benefits as of the date of his retirement since the parties divorce proceeding was still pending when the new subsection (c) went into effect. The appellate court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-10-21
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Fernandes
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1224
The court did not err in changing the plan from reunification to adoption, and the termination of father's parental rights was amply supported by the evidence.
Publication Date: 2019-10-14
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Bowes
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1209
Juvenile court properly found that minor's out-of-home placement was warranted because record did not support minor's contention that returning home would satisfy his need for treatment, supervision and rehabilitation. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-10-14
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Gantman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1211
Trial court erred in transferring jurisdiction over child custody matter to the state of Delaware because, without a proper motion to modify custody filed in the trial court, the trial court lacked the relevant reference date for its §5422 decision. Reversed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: James Hely, Donald A. Digioia
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-09-30
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Justice Hardiman
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul A. Clark
for defendant: Melissa H. Raksa and Ragner E. Jaeger (Office of Attorney General of New Jersey, Department of Health & Human Services)
Case Number: 18-3373
District Court Erred in Dismissing Claims Where Underlying State Court Proceedings Were Ongoing and Did Not Fall Under Younger Categories
Publication Date: 2019-09-30
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Strassburger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1145
Appeal from order in dependency proceeding precluding visitation when parent and children tested positive for drugs was not an appealable final order or collateral order. Appeal quashed.
Publication Date: 2019-09-30
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Dubow
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1144
Intermediate appellate courts only had authority and obligation to sua sponte review a trial court's failure to appoint any counsel for a child in a proceeding to involuntarily terminate parental rights, but not to review whether an appointed GAL had a conflict of interest in representing the child's best interests and legal interests. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-09-23
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Nichols
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1077
Trial court was authorized to sanction counsel where counsel permitted client's pro se discovery responses, which failed to comply with the trial court's order compelling production of discovery, to be served on opposing counsel. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-09-23
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Justice Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher T. Zirpoli, Esq. (Covington & Burling LLP)
for defendant: Gurbir S. Grewal, Thomas P. Lihan, and Michael R. Sarno (Office of the Attorney General Division of Law); Daniel R. Esposito (Buckly Theroux Kline); Robert E. Levy (Scarinci & Hollenbeck); Cyndee L. Allert and Elizabeth A. Farrell (Dughi Hewit & Domalewski); Paul J. Soderman; Darrell M. Felsenstein (Wells Jaworski & Lebman); Julien X. Neals and Robert N. Schwartz (Office of Bergen County Counsel); William T. McGloin (Connell Foley); William J. Buckley and Thomas N. Gamarello (Schenck Price Smith & King); Melissa J. Brown (Marks O’Neill O’Brien Doherty & Kelly)
Case Number: 16-4379
Appeal Dismissed Where Docket Entry Terminating Case Was Not Final Appealable Order
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read